Wealth for the Common Good

Wealth for the Common Good

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

At a moment when conservative Democrats are holding real healthcare reform hostage under the guise of “fiscal discipline”–fighting against a robust public option, promoting a regressive taxation of health benefits, and opposing a surtax on the wealthiest 1 percent of Americans–a network of business leaders and high net worth individuals has emerged as a powerful and sane voice in this debate: Wealth for the Common Good.

Recognizing that the Bush tax cuts allowed households with incomes over$250,000 to save more than $700 billion during a time of war–and that the economic policies of the past thirty years havedisproportionately benefited top earners–Wealth for the Common Goodhas called on the Obama administration and Congress to immediatelyrepeal the Bush cuts for households earning over $235,000 before they expire in 2011. Thatwould raise an estimated $43 billion in revenues and help address thisnation’s public investment deficit–in healthcare, schools,infrastructure and other areas vital to our nation’s health and wealth. Over 200 individuals (including me) who would pay these taxes have nowsigned onto the petition which will be delivered to President Obama, Speaker Nancy Pelosi and (for what it’s worth) House Republican Leader John Boehner.

As for the proposed surtax on individuals with incomes over $350,000 topay for healthcare reform, Chuck Collins, the co-founder of Wealth for the Common Good and a senior scholar atthe Institute for Policy Studies (IPS), told me: “The alternative totaxing the wealthy to pay for healthcare reform is to taxemployer-funded health benefits or not cover all Americans. Both ofthese are unacceptable options. The members of Wealth for the CommonGood are aware of both the urgency to reform healthcare and theunfairness of the current tax system. The proposed surcharge wouldgreatly reverse some of the most regressive elements of our federal taxsystem and fix our broken health system.”

People like Arul Menezes–a principal architect at Microsoft–recognize that their financial success is due in part to public investment. “Every day I benefit fromschools, hospitals, roads, bridges, parks, and civic amenities that werebuilt and paid for by previous generations who were much less well offthan we are today,” Menezes said. “Yet they had the collective will toinvest in their future and the future of their children.”

Let’s demonstrate that same kind of collective will once again andreverse our thirty-year public investment deficit–starting with healthcare.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read, just one of the many incisive, deeply-reported articles we publish daily. Now more than ever, we need fearless journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media.

Throughout this critical election year and a time of media austerity and renewed campus activism and rising labor organizing, independent journalism that gets to the heart of the matter is more critical than ever before. Donate right now and help us hold the powerful accountable, shine a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug, and build a more just and equitable future.

For nearly 160 years, The Nation has stood for truth, justice, and moral clarity. As a reader-supported publication, we are not beholden to the whims of advertisers or a corporate owner. But it does take financial resources to report on stories that may take weeks or months to properly investigate, thoroughly edit and fact-check articles, and get our stories into the hands of readers.

Donate today and stand with us for a better future. Thank you for being a supporter of independent journalism.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x