Senate, House Approve Stimulus With Scant GOP Support

Senate, House Approve Stimulus With Scant GOP Support

Senate, House Approve Stimulus With Scant GOP Support

With the deciding vote cast by Ohio Senator Sherrod Brown — who interrupted preparations for his mother’s funeral to return to Washington — the U.S. Senate approved the $787 billion stimulus bill Friday night.

The measure passed the Senate with the votes of all members of the Senate Democratic caucus and three moderate Republicans — Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe of Maine and Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania.

The three Republican votes made it possible to suggest that the bill President Obama will now sign was passed with a bipartisan majority.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

With the deciding vote cast by Ohio Senator Sherrod Brown — who interrupted preparations for his mother’s funeral to return to Washington — the U.S. Senate approved the $787 billion stimulus bill Friday night.

The measure passed the Senate with the votes of all members of the Senate Democratic caucus and three moderate Republicans — Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe of Maine and Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania.

The three Republican votes made it possible to suggest that the bill President Obama will now sign was passed with a bipartisan majority.

But the truth is that there was very little in the way of genuine bipartisanship on display Friday.

Weeks of negotiation and compromising by Democrats — which saw a reasonably populist job creation and economic recovery bill turned into a tepid plan weighted down with conservative tax schemes — still did not gain a single vote from House Republicans for the stimulus plan.

Before Friday’s Senate vote, the House approved the measure by a 246-183 vote.

The votes in favor of the stimulus came from 246 Democrats.

The votes against it came from 176 Republicans and seven Democrats.

The only real shift from the vote on the original House bill — which included a great deal more spending for school construction, state aid and health care initiatives with the potential to create jobs and ease the pain of the economic downturn — involved a slight decline in Democratic opposition.

When the legislation was initially considered, 11 Democrats — most of the conservative Blue Dogs — vote “no.” On Friday, only seven Democrats voted against it. (Among the switchers was Tennessee Congressman Jim Cooper, a prominent Blue Dog. Another switcher was Pennsylvania Congressman Paul Kanjorski, the chair of the Chairman of the House Financial Services Subcommittee on Capital Markets, Insurance, and Government Sponsored Enterprises.)

In the Senate, there was no change — except that New Hampshire Senator Judd Gregg, who was under consideration to become Obama’s Secretary of Commerce but has since withdrawn, cast an additional Republican vote against the stimulus.

So it was 57 Democrats and three Republicans voting “yes” in the Senate.

But, make no mistake, the votes by Collins, Snowe and Specter were the most meaningful.

Though they account for less than one percent of the overall membership of the Congress, Collins, Snowe and Specter have successfully redefined the legislation as something less than the majority Democrats proposed — and, unsettlingly, something less than may be needed to renew a sagging economy.

Collins, Snowe and Specter did not, however, succeed in convincing any Republicans that they changes they made were close enough to the opposition party’s generally agreed upon goal of doing little or nothing to address the current crisis.

For Americans who would like to do something most members of Congress have not, the bill — including scribbled changes — can be read here.

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x