The Undecideds: What’s Their Problem?

The Undecideds: What’s Their Problem?

The Undecideds: What’s Their Problem?

Undecided voters–"or, as I call them, morons," Bill Maher says–remained a stubborn five or six percent of the electorate as the polls reported final results yesterday. Obama and McCain each have spent tens of millions on TV ads to persuade them, and thousands of hours of door-to-door canvassing to talk to them face to face.

What’s their problem? The undecideds have been staring at the menu now for almost a year–why haven’t they made up their minds?

In fact the "undecideds" include at least four different groups:

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Undecided voters–"or, as I call them, morons," Bill Maher says–remained a stubborn five or six percent of the electorate as the polls reported final results yesterday. Obama and McCain each have spent tens of millions on TV ads to persuade them, and thousands of hours of door-to-door canvassing to talk to them face to face. 

What’s their problem? The undecideds have been staring at the menu now for almost a year–why haven’t they made up their minds?

In fact the "undecideds" include at least four different groups

— 1. The cross-pressured: people with conflicting political interests–upper-class white women from Republican families who are pro-choice; older white union members who don’t want a black president.

— 2. The cynical and alienated: people who say "all politicians are alike; they’re all liars; the system is rigged."

— 3. The inattentive and the ignorant: people who don’t pay attention to politics, who say they aren’t interested.

— 4. The deceivers: people who really have decided–but won’t tell the pollsters.

Each of these groups is likely to follow a different trajectory today:

The cross-pressured are the principal target for both campaigns, but for at least some of them, economic pressures push them towards Obama.

The cynical and alienated are likely to vote for a third party, or not at all.

The inattentive and ignorant may be moved by the enthusiasm and passion of the Obama campaign and its focus on the economy and health care.

The deceivers seem to me to be more likely to be secretive McCain supporters than Obama people.

So today it’s hard to see any decisive movement one way or the other from the undecideds, but we may see some movement towards Obama.

Nevertheless, their votes could be crucial in states where the leading candidate had less than 50 per cent in the final polls. In Florida, for instance: Pollster.com, which aggregates the poll numbers, ended up with Obama at 48.3 and McCain at 46.1. That means 5.6 of likely voters were undecided the weekend before Election Day. If 71 per cent of the Florida undecideds went for McCain, he’d win 51.1 per cent of the popular vote – and of course all of Florida’s 27 electoral votes.

The situation is similar in the final polling for Ohio, Indiana, Missouri and North Carolina, where Obama is ahead but didn’t reach the 50 per cent mark.

Still, there’s nothing that requires the undecideds to make up their minds. Despite the tens of millions the campaigns have spent to win their votes, many will probably stay home today. If that happens, Obama probably wins most of the swing states, where he was ahead in the final polls.

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x