Webb for President?

Webb for President?

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Jim Webb’s Democratic response to President Bush last night is drawing rave reviews–on the blogs, from television pundits and in the world of talk radio. “That response could do for Webb something akin to what Barack Obama’s 2004 convention speech did for the Illinois senator,” wrote The New Republic‘s Michael Crowley. Andrew Sullivan called Webb’s speech “the most effective Democratic response in the Bush years. He managed to bridge economic populism with military service and pride: a very potent combination.”

Some are even suggesting he run for President–or Veep. “I say he put himself in the veepstakes with his response,” blogged former American Prospect editor Mike Tomasky. “Why Can’t Our 2008 Contenders Talk Like Webb?” asked MYDD blogger Matt Stoller.

Since he arrived in DC, Webb has been a rock star. But it’s not because he tried to cultivate the Washington press corps or held glitzy fundraisers with lobbyists. It’s because he is the antithesis of the blow-dried, poll-tested, inherently cautious politicians who dominate so much of Washington. Certainly Webb has a number of shortcomings, which Bob Moser detailed in a Nation profile of him last October. Yet his popularity proves just how much the American people are yearning for authenticity, honesty and a healthy heaping of common sense, even if it comes in unconventional packaging.

Webb just became a Senator, so it’s highly unlikely he’ll run for higher office any time soon. But that doesn’t mean that the ever-expanding field of ’08 contenders shouldn’t pay attention to the lessons from his speech on Tuesday night.

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x