Noted.

Noted.

Ari Berman on getting Rahm Emanuel out of the White House.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

RUN, RAHM, RUN: Chicago Mayor Richard Daley‘s announcement that he will not seek a seventh term has prompted speculation that White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel will run for Daley’s post. “I’d be shocked if he doesn’t run,” a senior administration official told the Washington Post.

The sooner Emanuel leaves Washington, the better for Barack Obama. His White House is desperately in need of a serious shake-up, especially with Democrats facing a tidal wave of losses in the midterms. I’ll never quite understand why a transformational candidate chose the ultimate old-school inside operator to control his administration. Emanuel isn’t solely to blame for diluting Obama’s outsider brand, but he’s a major factor. In the Clinton White House and in Congress, he was often at odds with the very grassroots activists who powered Obama’s campaign. As chair of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee in 2006, he famously clashed with party chair Howard Dean and recruited Blue Dog candidates at the expense of progressive challengers. He brought his corporate centrism to the White House, pushing for a smaller-than-needed stimulus bill, urging Obama not to pursue healthcare reform, watering down the bill when he did and calling progressive activists who wanted to pressure obstructionist Democrats “fucking retarded.”

Emanuel’s alleged biggest asset—his ties to Capitol Hill and intricate knowledge of Beltway politics—has paid few dividends for Obama. The president’s legislative agenda has hit a brick wall in the Senate, and the dysfunction of the Democratic Congress, which Emanuel did little to tame, helps explain why voters are set to punish the party in power this November. “If picking the leading practitioner of the dark arts of the capital was a Faustian bargain for Obama in the name of getting things done, why haven’t things got done?” asked Peter Baker of the New York Times in a profile titled “The Limits of Rahmism.”

In a series of articles last spring, Emanuel or those close to him were quoted blaming others in the Obama White House for the president’s problems. But if Emanuel really is the most powerful chief of staff in modern history, then he deserves his share of the blame when things don’t go according to plan, especially since he devised the plan.

So what, exactly, qualifies Emanuel to run America’s third-largest city? That’s what the Progressive Campaign Change Committee and other critics are asking. “I will not support Rahm Emanuel in any future election for Congress, Mayor of Chicago, Governor, or other office,” says a petition drafted September 7 by the PCCC. “He sold us out on the public option and is a weak Democrat who caves instead of fighting conservatives and corporate power.”

It’s not too late for Obama to turn his presidency around, reconnect with the supporters who propelled him to the White House and reclaim his ambitious legislative agenda. But to do so, he’ll need fewer Emanuels in the building.   ARI BERMAN

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x