No-Sweat Sit-Ins Hit Academe

No-Sweat Sit-Ins Hit Academe

Will a donation from Nike deflect Stanford’s efforts to curb sweatshop labor in the making of its sports regalia?

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

On May 22 eleven Stanford University students staged a sit-in in the lobby of president John Hennessy’s office, demanding action on sweatshops. They were asking Hennessy to join the Worker Rights Consortium (WRC), a group founded by students and labor rights activists seven years ago to investigate abuses in the collegiate apparel industry, and to sign on to the Designated Suppliers Program (DSP), a system devised by the WRC to enforce universities’ existing codes of conduct. As wonky as it sounds, the DSP has recently caught fire among students. Earlier this spring sit-ins broke out at the universities of Southern California and Michigan demanding that those schools adopt the DSP. The week before the Stanford action, the University of Washington avoided a sit-in by doing just that.

Sophomore Bethany Woolman, reached by cellphone at the sit-in, said of president Hennessy’s dilemma over the DSP and the WRC, “We know he has the moral integrity to take this step, but we also know he needs the support of students to do it.” Might last year’s $105 million donation to the Stanford Business School by Nike CEO Phil Knight complicate Hennessy’s decision? After all, the University of Oregon backed out of the WRC after threats from multimillion-dollar donor Knight. Stanford’s administrators didn’t return calls in time for this report, but let’s hope they do show some integrity.

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x