In Fact…

In Fact…

SOUTHERN DISCOMFORT

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

SOUTHERN DISCOMFORT

Bob Moser writes: Once a wartime President has lost support in gung-ho North Carolina–home to major Army, Air Force and Marine bases and longtime bastion of pro-military sentiment–it’s safe to assume that he’s lost it everywhere. A recent poll conducted by Elon University provided grim news, then, for George W. Bush and his Iraq adventure: 57 percent of Tar Heels said they disapproved of the President’s handling of the war. But that wasn’t the worst finding for the floundering Bush Administration. The poll showed that active military personnel, reservists and veterans in North Carolina had turned just as strongly against the war as nonmilitary citizens. More than 56 percent disapproved of his war leadership. In perhaps the most startling result of all, when they were asked whether the war with Iraq was “worth fighting” in the first place, a mere 19 percent of these soldiers, ex-soldiers and soldiers-in-waiting said yes.

UN-COMMON REJECTION

Don Guttenplan writes: Despite hauling Chancellor Gordon Brown back from Israel and flying Foreign Secretary Jack Straw from Moscow so they could vote, Tony Blair suffered his first-ever defeat in Parliament in early November when the House of Commons rejected a government bill to allow terrorist suspects to be held for ninety days without charge. Coming in the wake of Work and Pensions Secretary David Blunkett’s forced resignation the previous week, Blair’s loss–forty-nine Labour MPs voted against the government–was a huge, self-inflicted wound to his political authority. The defeat came despite a lobbying blitz by the Metropolitan Police commissioner, and in the face of opinion polls showing overwhelming public support for the government’s position. Parliament’s belated discovery of a backbone means that Tony Blair, who has already promised not to run again, remains in office, but not in power. The Iraq War’s chickens may finally be coming home to roost.

WHAT–US WORRY?

The American Society of Magazine Editors selected The Nation‘s November 13, 2000, cover (of Bush as Alfred E.Neuman) as one of the top forty magazine covers of the past forty years.

Become a Sustaining Donor This September

Between the reemergence of right-wing red-baiting and Donald Trump’s use of the chilling National Security Presidential Memorandum–7 to criminalize left political organizing, we’re seeing McCarthyism reborn before our eyes.

This assault on democracy cannot be ignored or wished away. Resisting it requires bravery in the face of threats and repression, a steadfast commitment to the truth, and the unwavering belief that we can—and will—overcome this darkness.

We must have an independent media that sets the record straight, unearths corruption and abuses of power, and advances a politics of justice and dignity for all if we’re to win this fight.

That’s why I’m writing to you today. This September, The Nation needs to add 100 monthly donors to sustain our progressive journalism. Your contribution makes the next investigative report, the next truth-speaking column, and the next pathbreaking essay all possible. 

I hope you’ll support our work with a recurring donation today. If you donate $10 or more a month, we’ll send you a brand new “Hands Off the Free Press!” sticker to recognise your commitment to our cause. Please, donate today. 

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editor and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x