Do Terrorists Deserve Due Process?

Do Terrorists Deserve Due Process?

Hayes debates Scarborough over the constitutional rights of terrorists.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

The hosts of Morning Joe turn to Chris Hayes to debate the merits
of a Wall Street Journal editorial called “Cheney’s Revenge,” which
suggests that the American people prefer the way Bush and Cheney dealt
with terrorists by skipping over the Miranda rights that are normally
afforded to criminals. Hayes and host Joe Scarborough disagree on
whether most Americans want Miranda rights to be applied to foreign
terrorist suspects.

Hayes argues that no matter what people want, due process of law is in
the Constitution and applies to foreign criminals and illegal
immigrants. “This is a really important point to hammer home,” Hayes
says. “The Constitution does not…simply apply to citizens. This is
absolutely 1,000 percent settled law and the 14th amendment means that
it [applies] to anyone who’s picked up and arrested.”

Scarborough counters that the Miranda rights were not applied to Nazi
prisoners of war and so do not need to be applied to those captured in
the war on terror. He also points out that war criminals have different
rights than regular criminals. Hayes counters by saying that, “you
cannot just…prior to the actual constitutional due process, dub
someone a war criminal and then deny them the due process that’s
required of the Constitution.”

Morgan Ashenfelter

Check out more great Nation videos on our YouTube channel.

Support The Nation’s June Fundraising Campaign

With the midterm elections now firmly upon us, the question is whether Democratic candidates will do more than merely occupy ballot lines as mild alternatives to the red-hot crisis that is Donald Trump.

As Trump spends over $1 billion a day on a globally destabilizing war on Iran and admits that he doesn’t “think about Americans’ financial situation,” millions across the country are struggling with the surging costs of essentials. Democrats must seize this moment and advance bold, small-“d” populist ideas—not settle for cynical caution that once again snatches defeat from the jaws of victory.

The Nation elevates progressive ideas, movements, and elected officials achieving real change across the country into the national conversation. At the same time, our journalists are exposing how crypto and AI-funded super PACs are spending hundreds of millions of dollars to knock out candidates they oppose, reporting on the devastating impact of the Supreme Court’s evisceration of the Voting Rights Act, and sounding the alarm on attempts by red states to quickly redraw electoral maps, disenfranchising Southern Black voters.

We can play this critical role because of support from readers like you. This June, we’re raising $20,000 to power The Nation’s independent journalism in the run-up to November’s immensely consequential elections.

It’s in our power to build a more just society, and your support at this critical moment brings us closer to that bold vision. I hope you’ll donate today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Huevel
Editor and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x