Letters From the September 19/26, 2022, Issue

Letters From the September 19/26, 2022, Issue

Letters From the September 19/26, 2022, Issue

Studying ecology… Pipelines to plowshares… Graphic depictions…

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Studying Ecology

Re “The Tick Apocalypse,” by Jimmy Tobias [Aug. 8/15]: Among recent advances in our understanding of Lyme disease, a 2021 work by Howard S. Ginsberg et al. in PLOS Biology established why the disease is so rare in the southern US, despite the occurrence of the appropriate tick vectors. In brief, these ticks show a strong preference for reptiles rather than mammals, and these reptiles are poor hosts for the Lyme bacterium. Indeed, the research points to the importance of studying animal ecology and supporting land use and management plans that promote reptile populations. As winter temperatures continue to rise with climate change, their numbers may grow in higher latitudes and lower the incidence of the disease.
Manuel Lerdau
Departments of Environmental Sciences and of Biology
University of Virginia

charlottesville, va.

Pipelines to Plowshares

Two powerful streams of thought that challenge the necessity for violence in the struggle against climate change deserved more consideration in Thea Riofrancos’s otherwise helpful review of Andreas Malm’s book How to Blow Up a Pipeline [“A Burning Planet,” Aug. 8/15]. One is the moral case for the pacifism that Malm apparently dismisses, whose roots can include the Gospel, social justice, and the spiritual imagination. A direct challenge to Malm’s argument can be found in the creative (yet destructive of property) civil disobedience of Daniel and Philip Berrigan and their anti-war Plowshares movement allies.

The other case is the pragmatic one. In their study of campaigns for social change between 1900 and 2016, Erica Chenoweth and Maria Stephan found that a commitment to nonviolence received higher levels of citizen support, generated opportunities for creative tactical shifts, and evoked less defensive responses from the ruling powers than their violent counterparts. The evidence of the strengths and successes of nonviolence refutes Malm’s too easy and, in my opinion, dangerous recommendation of violence as the method for combating climate change.

Walter (Jerry) Kendall
Professor Emeritus
University of Illinois Chicago School of Law

chicago

Graphic Depictions

The illustration by Lily Qian for the review of Vladimir Soro­kin’s novel Their Four Hearts is magnificent [“Pure Negation,” Aug. 8/15]. Gorgeous and mysteriously compelling at first, it merits reexamination after reading Gregory Afinogenov’s informative article, at which point you realize that it simultaneously conveys the ideas and the emotive punch of Sorokin’s writings. Bravo, and more illustrations from this artist please.
Sean Brady

Corrections

In the Aug. 8/15 issue: “The Tick Apocalypse” incorrectly referred to ticks as insects. In “A Burning Planet,” the name of the Lummi Nation was misspelled. “Selective Empathy,” by Viet Thanh Nguyen, stated that Lt. William Calley was pardoned by Richard Nixon. Calley was not pardoned; after Nixon’s intervention on his behalf, he was paroled and spent much of the sentence under house arrest.

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x