The Dismissal of Captain Crozier Is No Way to Treat a Hero

The Dismissal of Captain Crozier Is No Way to Treat a Hero

The Dismissal of Captain Crozier Is No Way to Treat a Hero

Captain Brett Crozier is a new kind of military hero, but his removal reveals the old-school power games in the Pacific.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Captain Brett Crozier is a new kind of military hero, a senior Navy officer who prioritized the health of his crew over a naval mission, and in the process unwittingly revealed the absurdity of US security policy in a time of pandemic.

As commander of the USS Theodore Roosevelt, Crozier sent a letter to the Navy pleading for permission to dock the aircraft carrier at Guam to treat the sailors on board suffering from Covid-19 and prevent further spread of the contagion. The Navy abruptly removed Crozier from command of the ship, saying that his letter would incite panic. As the captain left the ship, crew members cheered and chanted his name as an expression of thanks.

Crozier himself has tested positive for the virus.

Crozier’s letter observed, “We are not at war,” and stressed that we need to take care of “our most trusted asset—our sailors.” There is no military justification to risk lives, he wrote.

The captain’s action was too much for acting Secretary of the Navy Thomas Modly, who flew to Guam on Monday to speak to the crew over the ship’s intercom. In fiery remarks punctuated with profanity, Modly insulted and demeaned Crozier, calling him “stupid” and describing the letter as an act of “betrayal.” He did not deign to tour the ship or even talk with crew members.

Modly put the incident into wider context by saying he took issue with Crozier’s statement that we are not at war. The reason we are here, he declared, is because of “a big authoritative regime called China.”

Modly’s rant unleashed a flood of criticism and led to his quick resignation, but it is worth reflecting on his mention of China and what this tells us about the direction of American policy in the region.

The current mission of the Roosevelt, and the reason for its presence in the Western Pacific, is to participate in Washington’s game of great-power competition and “show of force” missions against China. The national security establishment considers China a threat, a peer competitor, to use the language of the imperial class. China is a challenge to US hegemony, and, so the logic goes, it must be put in its place by sending aircraft carriers to remind Beijing of US strike power.

All of this is dangerous and unnecessary, and contrary to the US strategic interest, especially now when we need China’s cooperation in countering Covid-19. China is sending medical equipment to other countries and sharing knowledge with scientists here and around the world in the search for a vaccine against the virus. Governor Cuomo in New York has reported that China is facilitating the shipment of 1,100 donated ventilators to hard-hit medical facilities in his state.

Captain Crozier was right to say there is no justification for risking the lives of service members, and he deserves respect for thinking of his crew and trying to address the threat of disease.

The virus is a more imminent and serious danger than any imagined aggression from Beijing. There is no need for stirring up trouble with China, or for continuing to waste tens of billions of dollars on unnecessary weapons and military operations. We should focus our resources instead on strengthening the public health system here at home and working with other nations to contain the virus and prevent its further spread.

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x