Trump’s Voter Intimidation Dog Doesn’t Bark in Philly

Trump’s Voter Intimidation Dog Doesn’t Bark in Philly

Trump’s Voter Intimidation Dog Doesn’t Bark in Philly

But the GOP nominee continues to raise unfounded doubts about the integrity of the election. 

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Philadelphia, PA—For weeks leading up to the election, Donald Trump intimated that people in “certain areas” (or “other communities” or “certain sections”) might steal the election. Trump was universally understood to be talking about inner-city, minority-heavy communities, and Trump was particularly focused on Philadelphia. “And we have to make sure we’re protected. We have to make sure the people of Philadelphia are protected that the vote counts are 100 percent,” Trump said in early October. “I hear these horror shows and we have to make sure that this election is not stolen from us and is not taken away from us. And everybody knows what I’m talking about.”

These comments raised the specter that Trump supporters might indeed attempt to “make sure” there was no funny business at polls in the city, by showing up and intimidating potential voters.

But at polling stations across Philadelphia on Tuesday, there was no sign of any such efforts. The Nation visited numerous stations across the city, particularly in West and North Philadelphia, and neither election monitors there nor voters reported any problems.

The city police said as of late Tuesday afternoon there were no reports of armed persons at polling stations—something that did occur in Virginia and Texas—and local civil-liberties groups reported no major disruptions. Local AM talk-radio stations featured a stream of callers checking in and talking about their experiences throughout the day, with no reported incidents of intimidation—although on WURD, a black progressive station, it was on the mind of nearly every caller.

The closest example was when James O’Keefe, a conservative performance artist and convicted criminal, released a short video of himself in disguise trailing a church van that he said was filled with voters. It is not illegal to provide people rides to the polls; it is illegal to harass or intimidate voters. It’s not clear O’Keefe ever interacted with any of those voters.

But overall—not just in Philadelphia, but across the country—reports of voter intimidation were practically nonexistent. That’s a relief after the dangerous and unprecedented rhetoric from Donald Trump as the election drew to a close.

There are still serious dangers, however, that Trump will continue to question the integrity of the election. He raised direct doubts on Tuesday, saying without evidence on Fox News that machines were switching Republican votes to Democratic ones. “It’s happening at various places…. It’s been reported,” he said. Asked if he would accept the voters’ decision, Trump said, “Well, we’re going to see how things play out today.”

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x