November 30, 1999: World Trade Organization Meeting in Seattle Disrupted By Anti-Globalization Protests

November 30, 1999: World Trade Organization Meeting in Seattle Disrupted By Anti-Globalization Protests

November 30, 1999: World Trade Organization Meeting in Seattle Disrupted By Anti-Globalization Protests

“The scenes from Seattle are something not seen since the sixties, but in their totality unimaginable even then.”

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Before the World Trade Organization meeting in Seattle on this day in 1999, The Nation had devoted its entire issue to what its cover called the impending “Battle in Seattle.” In the issue following the confrontation between protesters and the police, the magazine published an editorial heralding the new era of people power:

After the Battle in Seattle one thing is certain: The next WTO confab will be held somewhere like Singapore or Jakarta. The corporate-dominated trade regimen enforced by the WTO is generating so much opposition that it can meet only under the sort of armed protection provided by a militarized state. Indeed, one silver lining of corporate-managed globalization is that it has harmonized US domestic protest against it to unprecedented levels of European-style militancy. Bill Clinton planned his appearance before the WTO as a showcase for successful free-trade policies, but he would up having to give his speech under the umbrella of a declared state of emergency bolstered by barricades, curfews, riot police and National Guard troops. The media focus on a few broken store windows should not distract from the profundity of what has happened here. A phatasmagorical mix of tens of thousands of peaceful demonstrators—husky, red-jacketed steelworkers marching alongside costumed sea turtle impersonators, environmentalists with miners, human rights activists with small family farmers—stood against the WTO, succeeded in closing down its opening sessinos and thrust the once-obscure issue of fair trade onto center stage….

The scenes from Seattle are something not seen since the sixties, but in their totality unimaginable even then.

November 30, 1999

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read, just one of the many incisive, deeply-reported articles we publish daily. Now more than ever, we need fearless journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media.

Throughout this critical election year and a time of media austerity and renewed campus activism and rising labor organizing, independent journalism that gets to the heart of the matter is more critical than ever before. Donate right now and help us hold the powerful accountable, shine a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug, and build a more just and equitable future.

For nearly 160 years, The Nation has stood for truth, justice, and moral clarity. As a reader-supported publication, we are not beholden to the whims of advertisers or a corporate owner. But it does take financial resources to report on stories that may take weeks or months to properly investigate, thoroughly edit and fact-check articles, and get our stories into the hands of readers.

Donate today and stand with us for a better future. Thank you for being a supporter of independent journalism.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x