A Moral Case for Climate Action

A Moral Case for Climate Action

Pope Francis understands that the choice to confront the climate crisis now lies with the people.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

On June 18, Pope Francis released his encyclical on the environment and climate change, calling for urgent climate action. In it, he makes the religious and moral argument for addressing the climate crisis, emphasizing the need for “technology based on the use of highly polluting fossil fuels” to be “progressively replaced without delay.”

The encyclical aligns the Catholic Church with the grassroots climate movement, not with institutions that produce and ignore crisis. “Particular appreciation is owed to those who tirelessly seek to resolve the tragic effects of environmental degradation on the lives of the world’s poorest,” he writes. “Young people demand change.” This is the wisdom of a leader who understands that the choice to confront the climate crisis now lies with the people. Institutions will follow.

Pope Francis also demonstrates how influence should be used in a time of crisis. With privilege comes the responsibility to advocate for the people who power has silenced. This message is shared by the fossil fuel divestment movement, which calls on prominent individuals and institutions to convert their privilege into heroic moral leadership. Pope Francis understands: He has even recruited Nation columnist and author Naomi Klein to join his efforts. His call to action and recognition of grassroots organizing will give activists far greater leverage to push Catholic institutions to divest from fossil fuels.

The pope lives what I call the “radical now,” demonstrating how power and politics must be challenged in the name of what we love. He’s not waiting for the future, nor are we.

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x