The Death of the Blackout Rule, and Why the NFL Fights On

The Death of the Blackout Rule, and Why the NFL Fights On

The Death of the Blackout Rule, and Why the NFL Fights On

The FCC ruled 5-0 against the NFL, showing that their stranglehold over government and fans could be coming to an end.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

The NFL is on quite the losing streak, reeling from one public relations disaster to the next. Yesterday it was officially announced that the NFL lost again, taking a 5-0 drubbing from the Federal Communications Commission in a unanimous vote to end its repugnant local television “blackout rule.” Existing since 1976, the rule allowed the NFL to make sure that games would not be televised in local markets if the stadiums were not almost entirely sold out 72 hours prior to the broadcast. This may have made at least a logical business sense in the 1970s, when a team’s solvency lived and died on the basis of home attendance. That was also a time when 50 percent of all games were eligible for blackout. But given that we are living in an era when 99 percent of games sell out, the rule’s existence made about as much sense as giving away free packs of unfiltered Lucky Strikes with every ticket…. or denying that playing in the NFL can be linked to debilitating head injuries

In addition, given the fact that owners make billions on television deals, luxury boxes, personalized seat licenses, and public subsidies, the idea that the NFL should still be in a position to decide whether their games get aired is the height of corporate arrogance. It is made even worse, of course, by the fact that unlike in 1976, we the people have paid our own tax dollars toward every single NFL stadium, whether we are fans or not. We also pay exorbitant cable television fees for “free” channels, money that flows towards the NFL coffers. This is a league built on a foundation of public welfare, yet they still want to decide who amongst the public gets to watch. Stunningly, the NFL may be fighting the FCC ruling. Instead of bowing away gracefully and recognizing, as Keith Olbermann, artfully explained, just how achingly anachronistic the ruling is, they could be girding up to figure out someway to keep the blackout rule in place.

I spoke to Brian Frederick of the Sports Fan Coalition (full disclosure, I have a seat on the SFC board) who has written an e-book called Upset about the fan-based push against the NFL’s lobbyists that made today a reality. I asked him, if the rule is so irrelevant to the NFL’s bottom line, why exactly they have fought so hard to keep it. He said, “The NFL spent has decades fighting to receive subsidies from the government – from approval of the AFL/NFL merger to its nonprofit status to its precious antitrust exemption for negotiating broadcast contracts. The NFL fears that if it loses this subsidy, all these other subsidies would be subject to greater scrutiny, as they should be. The NFL is simply trying to protect its spoils and quash a rebellion from fed-up fans."

As for the FCC, they have defended the blackout rule in every instance since the inauguration of the rule. What has changed? The current mood about the NFL cannot be ignored when assessing why this decision was made. As observed in Forbes, “… the FCC could have issued its ruling much in advance of today. Thus, there perhaps exists an argument that the current climate surrounding the NFL–from the Ray Rice and Adrian Peterson suspensions to the Redskins name debate and concussion litigation–finally motivated the FCC to pull the plug on its sports blackout rules.”

The NFL has been able to maintain a relationship of power and dominance over players, fans, and the viewing public for far too long. Their army of twenty-six full-time lobbyists has ensured that the government does not get in the way. Any puncture in their seemingly impenetrable armor, any humbling of their status, any ability to let some oxygen into their room should be seen as very welcome.

As Frederick said to me, "For the first time in modern history, an organized group of fans went up against the professional sports leagues and beat them in the public policy arena. The FCC's elimination of its blackout rule is the first step in extricating the government from the business of professional sports. The NFL and the other leagues should be on watch that when they abuse fans and the taxpaying public in the interests of profits, those fans now know how to play defense." It's bigger than blackouts and the fight has finally been joined.

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x