A Few Words About a Few Words

A Few Words About a Few Words

Cryptic crosswords as a vocabulary-building exercise 

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

(First off, links to the current puzzle and solving guidelines.)

In response to our post about themed cryptics, a British newspaper crossword editor who wishes to remain anonymous commented:

“In British cryptics, a barred grid indicates difficult vocabulary rather than a theme. The intention for most blocked grid puzzles is that you should be able to finish them without reference books, though you may have written in one or two answers that you would like to check afterwards. Most barred grid puzzles name a standard reference dictionary (always Chambers) and expect most solvers to use it. There are both themed blocked-grid puzzles and unthemed barred-grid ones. Themed block ones could be in any paper, but are most common in the Guardian, the Independent and the Financial Times—the Times and Telegraph, the other two in our weekday “big 5” have very few themed puzzles. Unthemed barred grid ones, all on Sundays, are Azed (Observer), Mephisto (Sunday Times) and Beelzebub (Independent on Sunday).

“In a country [the United States] where other blocked grid puzzles often have themes, it seems perfectly sensible to me to have themed blocked grid cryptics.”

And in fact, themed black-square cryptics have been a hit among our solvers. At least we think so, based on the reaction from both our friends and the strangers who have written to us. Let’s hope this catches on, and more themed black-square cryptics start appearing in other publications!

In another post, we mentioned our willingness to include uncommon words in our puzzles. This is a break with both US and British convention for black-square puzzles, but it is in line with our predecessor Frank Lewis, who had no objection to expanding his solvers’ vocabulary. See this 2008 homage to Frank by Peter Kramer, the author of Listening to Prozac, in his blog on the Psychology Today site.

As cryptic editors for The Enigma, we edited puzzles that are often considerably more challenging than anything else available in the United States. Part of that level of difficulty is achieved by borrowing a few ideas from our British counterparts, including the reliance on a standard dictionary, as mentioned above. In The Enigma, anything whatsoever that appears in Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary is fair game. So it is legitimate not only to use obscure words as entries, but even obscure usages of words in clues. In our Nation puzzle, we do not go that far. If the entry is obscure, the clue will be straightforward. Here is an example from puzzle #3224:

Main objection raised is petty (3-3)

This was a down clue, so “raised” indicated a reversal. The answer was TIN-POT, as in “a tin-pot dictator”, which was not familiar to some solvers. Still, given T.N-P.T this was guessable, especially with the help of TOP NIT, two common words.

If the entry is common, we may reference an unfamiliar meaning of it, as in this double definition from the same puzzle:

Grasp and shoot (4)

The answer was TWIG. A twig is a shoot, and to twig means to comprehend, or grasp—a usage you may not have been familiar with. Again, with the W and the G checked, this seemed quite gettable to us.

Still, our use of less-known words is the exception, not the rule. We are assuming that, like Peter Kramer, you’re not averse to learning a new word or two when solving one of our puzzles. When you come across such a word, you can take a trip to the dictionary or the Internet to confirm your hunch. (We usually check two or three references before including an obscure word.) And you can tell your friends who don’t twig your enjoyment of cryptic crosswords that their objections are petty, and that this hobby of yours is educational: After all, the word you learn today may turn up in a puzzle tomorrow!

Time is running out to have your gift matched 

In this time of unrelenting, often unprecedented cruelty and lawlessness, I’m grateful for Nation readers like you. 

So many of you have taken to the streets, organized in your neighborhood and with your union, and showed up at the ballot box to vote for progressive candidates. You’re proving that it is possible—to paraphrase the legendary Patti Smith—to redeem the work of the fools running our government.

And as we head into 2026, I promise that The Nation will fight like never before for justice, humanity, and dignity in these United States. 

At a time when most news organizations are either cutting budgets or cozying up to Trump by bringing in right-wing propagandists, The Nation’s writers, editors, copy editors, fact-checkers, and illustrators confront head-on the administration’s deadly abuses of power, blatant corruption, and deconstruction of both government and civil society. 

We couldn’t do this crucial work without you.

Through the end of the year, a generous donor is matching all donations to The Nation’s independent journalism up to $75,000. But the end of the year is now only days away. 

Time is running out to have your gift doubled. Don’t wait—donate now to ensure that our newsroom has the full $150,000 to start the new year. 

Another world really is possible. Together, we can and will win it!

Love and Solidarity,

John Nichols 

Executive Editor, The Nation

Ad Policy
x