After Big Super Tuesday, Santorum Gets Second Look from GOP Online

After Big Super Tuesday, Santorum Gets Second Look from GOP Online

After Big Super Tuesday, Santorum Gets Second Look from GOP Online

Forget the Google Problem—Rick Santorum is getting lots of interest online from voters in key states.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Rick Santorum emerged from Super Tuesday with ammunition to continue a long fight for the nomination—winning several states decisively, finishing strong in Ohio and burnishing his reputation as a challenger who perseveres even when drastically outspent by Romney. That’s a quality many fallen rivals did not have. And while Romney still has many advantages, the calendar is not one of them: he has a lead of 150 delegates, but about 1,700 remain up in the air between now and the GOP’s August convention.

The big question is whether Santorum can build these regional victories into a national constituency that is excited and focused enough to overturn the party’s unloved-but-expected nominee. Some of the clues to that challenge are online, where data show many voters around the country really are giving Santorum another look.

Santorum’s first turn in the spotlight came with his surprising January victory in the Iowa Caucus. His website traffic surged past Romney that week, a feat for a little-known candidate. Some of the largest groups of visitors were concentrated in early primary states, like Florida, South Carolina and Virginia, according to Google Trends. Santorum’s online footprint faded quickly, but spiked again after he won Colorado and Minnessota on February 7, and remained higher than Romney for most of the month, according to Alexa.com.

While there is no way to directly link aggregate web traffic to voting patterns, search volume does show that interest in Santorum has kept up with the voting schedule. Right now, his top five search locations were all recent primary states—Idaho, Oklahoma, Michigan, Tennessee and Ohio. (Out of all Google searches nationwide, “Super Tuesday” came in sixth on Tuesday, still trailing Rush Limbaugh at number three.)

Unlike Romney, who is well known from a previous presidential bid and able to buy plenty of ads introducing himself to voters, Santorum needs grassroots and online support to reach voters. His YouTube channel has now garnered about 2.1 million video views; the most popular item was posted just two weeks ago, a lighthearted anti-Romney ad called “Rombo.” The channel still trails Romney’s, however, which has 5.3 million cumulative video views, and Gingrich, who garnered 9.3 million views and recently uploaded his twenty-nine-minute energy address on YouTube.

Beyond the primary, however, none of the Republicans candidates are doing as well online as their would-be opponent, Barack Obama. At the comparable time last cycle, in March 2008, his online support was higher by every measure (including record-breaking fundraising and several viral video hits that each drew millions of views). Today, to pick one remarkable contrast, total views on the Obama YouTube channel add up to 173 million.

“The GOP still has a long way to go,” says Alexander Bernard, a Stanford Law graduate who just launched Whistelstop.com, which measures candidates’ political impact online. According to his calculations on the week leading up to Super Tuesday, Obama captured 71 percent of the total “digital footprint in the presidential race,” Bernard told The Nation, while “the four Republican candidates combined” took the other 29 percent. For a long shot like Santorum, that slice of a slice may not be enough.


Two of Santorum’s most popular videos are below.

 

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x