Mitt Calls His Opponents Girls, but Not to Their Faces

Mitt Calls His Opponents Girls, but Not to Their Faces

Mitt Calls His Opponents Girls, but Not to Their Faces

Romney feminized his foes three times in five days. What’s he really trying to say?

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

       

Mitt Romney has a new weapon to lob at opponents: calling them girls. Or at least famous females.

Mitt launched the stealthily sexist name-calling over the holidays. First, last Wednesday, he likened Newt Gingrich to “Lucille Ball in the chocolate factory,” too goofy and disorganized to even get on the ballot in Virginia. It was a good image, upending Gingrich’s grandiose comparison of his electoral setback to Pearl Harbor and giving the media an excuse to run the hilarious I Love Lucy footage.

It even forced Newt to visit an actual chocolate factory, where he said, rather pathetically, “Now that I have the courage to come to the chocolate factory I hope Governor Romney will have the courage to debate me one-on-one.” (As if to prove he didn’t come up with the Lucy line himself, Mitt later over-explained that “it was humorous joke.” Jokes and pop-culture references are part of the campaign by Romney’s handlers to show their man’s looser, lighter side. “I live for laughter,” Romney informed Wolf Blitzer.)

But two days later, when Romney likened a different male pol to a female, the analogy fell flat. Romney was pooh-poohing Obama’s argument that he prevented the recession from getting worse: “The other day President Obama said, you know, it could be worse. Sounds like Marie Antoinette, ‘Let them eat cake.’ ”

For Mitt—a multimillionaire who joked (again with the jokes) “I’m also unemployed,” who speaks fluent French, and who says more homes should be foreclosed to let the market work—to call someone an out-of-touch elite is absurd on the face of it.

Which makes it all the more obvious that Romney is looking for any excuse, no matter how thin, to girlify his opponents.

Because he did it again, on Sunday, this time comparing Obama to Kim Kardashian. “The gap between his promises and his performance,” Romney said of the president, “is the largest I’ve seen since, well, the Kardashian wedding and the promise of ‘till death do us part.’ ”

That makes it three times in five days that Romney femmed-up his foes. As Howard Fineman said on Hardball last night, “I guarantee you, it’s not accidental.”  

And for Mitt in particular the maneuver is telling. In much the same way that he’s lurching hard-right to cover his moderate scent, questioning the cojones of his rivals is an attempt to distract from his own weak, tentative, wishy-washy image.

Of course, the girlie-man rap isn’t exactly new in politics. Maureen Dowd has made a career of it, writing that Al Gore was “so feminized that he’s practically lactating.” Among her descriptions of Obama are “Scarlett O’Hara,” “legally blonde,” “Obambi” and a “46-year-old virgin.”

I don’t want to engage in this emasculating tack; I’m not going to call Romney a girl.

But it sure does seem that Mitt is channeling his inner Maureen.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x