Cyberwar: When We Do It, It’s OK; If They Do It, It’s War

Cyberwar: When We Do It, It’s OK; If They Do It, It’s War

Cyberwar: When We Do It, It’s OK; If They Do It, It’s War

The ultimate in cyber-hypocrisy from the Pentagon.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

The ultimate, perhaps, in hypocrisy? Though it’s widely been reported that the United States and Israel worked together to sabotage Iran’s nuclear program by means of a cyberattack, one using a computer worm called Stuxnet that wrecked as many as a thousand of Iran’s centrifuges, now the Pentagon says that if anyone does anything like that to us, it’s an act of war—and the United States might feel free to retaliate using military means.

Reported the New York Times yesterday:

“The Pentagon, trying to create a formal strategy to deter cyberattacks on the United States, plans to issue a new strategy soon declaring that a computer attack from a foreign nation can be considered an act of war that may result in a military response.”

 It’s a policy under development by the Obama administration for two years, as the article points out:

“In May 2009…the head of the United States Strategic Command, Gen. Kevin P. Chilton, told reporters that in the event of a cyberattack ‘the law of armed conflict will apply,’ and warned that ‘I don’t think you take anything off the table’ ” in considering a response. ‘Why would we constrain ourselves?’ he asked, according to an article about his comments that appeared in Stars and Stripes."

And if Iran had not “constrained itself” after the US-Israeli sabotage campaign, which is ongoing and which, apparently, involves the kidnapping and assassination of Iranian scientists, too? Don’t ask.

Like this blog post? Read it on The Nation’s free iPhone App, NationNow.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x