Lawrence O’Donnell Trumps Pundits

Lawrence O’Donnell Trumps Pundits

MSNBC host knows the difference between hype and real politics.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

As he often is, Lawrence O’Donnell was right: Donald Trump’s campaign was fake, and he’d announce that he wasn’t running for president on May 16—which is exactly what Trump did on Monday.  

May 16, as O’Donnell’s been reminding us, was the day that NBC would announce its fall lineup—if Trump’s Celebrity Apprentice was on it, there’d be no candidate Trump. A few weeks back O’Donnell criticized the Beltway media for not pressing NBC on whether it would renew the show, and he zapped NBC, his own employer, for not immediately ending Trump’s charade—and all the birther time it bought—by revealing what it already knew.

But O’Donnell went beyond crowing “I told you so.” He went to the heart of the matter: the political pundits’ “inability to understand what is happening right in front of them.”

And it’s not just Trump. In his excellent rant (video below), O’Donnell went at the New York Times for treating Huckabee’s announcement that he wouldn’t make a presidential bid “as news, when, in fact, Mike Huckabee, at Fox News Roger Ailes’s insistence, had made it patently obvious that he wasn’t running for president as far back as March 2.” That was the day that Fox News suspended Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum from its payroll because Fox knew they were running, but kept on Huck and Sarah Palin, because it knew they weren’t. But to this day, O’Donnell complained, political pundits frame Palin in the will-she-or-won’t-she category.

Whether it’s buying into fake WMDs, fake “urgent” issues like the deficit, or fake political campaigns, the MSM seems unable, or unwilling, to grasp the difference between real politics and hype. 

These charades may or may not be good for ratings, but they’re definitely bad for connecting even the most glaring of dots: they continually tell viewers and pundits alike that getting by on ignorance and wishful thinking is the way to go.

“Political pundits,” O’Donnell said at the end, “have been given their first intelligence test of the 2012 campaign.”  

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

CORRECTION: D’oh! In the original version of this story, I wrote that MSNBC contributor Jon Meacham believed that Donald Trump would be the next president of the United States. But in the Morning Joe segment I linked to, he and Joe Scarborough were totally, and quite wryly, joking. I apologize to Meacham, whose views on Trump are in fact much closer to O’Donnell’s.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x