Mark Hertsgaard: Ignoring Climate Change Is a Crime

Mark Hertsgaard: Ignoring Climate Change Is a Crime

Mark Hertsgaard: Ignoring Climate Change Is a Crime

As the US government continues to ignore the science on climate change, we are heading down the path towards an uninhabitable world.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Addressing climate change is now not only about how to reduce our carbon emissions, but how to learn to live with the environmental damage that’s already been done. So says The Nation’s Mark Hertsgaard, who joined Democracy Now! on Friday to discuss his new book, Hot: Living Through the Next Fifty Years on Earth, which explains why this country’s inaction when it comes to climate change is a crime. The victims of the crime, he says, are the two billion kids who have been born around the world—since scientists alerted us about this problem—who face a life sentence dealing with the consequences.

The recent budget deal approved by Congress cuts $1.6 billion from the Environmental Protection Agency. This 16 percent decrease reduces funding for a climate desk at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and eliminates the position of assistant to the president for energy and climate change.

These cuts are a direct result of the fact that the United States is the only country where the legitimacy of the science behind climate change has been called into question, Hertsgaard says. Even other countries run by conservative governments have been more willing to confront climate change than the Obama administration.

The solution lies in investing in energy efficiency, not nuclear energy. “The reality is, going nuclear will make climate change worse, not better,” he says. “Look at the economics. It costs so much money to build a plant, it takes so long to build that plant, that by the time you’ve got it online, if you invested that same amount of money in energy efficiency, you would get seven times more greenhouse gas emission reductions.”

—Sara Jerving

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x