Local Man Actually Eats Calendar (7)

Local Man Actually Eats Calendar (7)

Clues that read like headlines

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Many cryptic crossword aficionados take it for granted that the best clues are the ones that don’t look like clues. Ideally, they say, a clue resembles a piece of text that could appear in some other context: prose, poetry or a newspaper headline, as in this post’s title, which could have been lifted from The Onion. (See the end of the post for the solutions.)

But the use of journalistic syntax—headlinese, let’s call it—can bring some grammatical surprises, both on the surface of a clue and in its cryptic workings. Two aspects of this style in particular tend to be noteworthy: the omission of “and” to join items in a list (the technical term is asyndeton), and the omission of definite or indefinite articles.

The omission of “and” (as in the classic tabloid headline “Mom Kills Kids, Self”) pops up most often in connection with wordplay that seems to waver between the use of singular and plural verbs. (We discussed this question briefly here.) When you have a phrase of two or more words—perhaps as fodder for an anagram or a reversal—many solvers expect them to be treated as a unit and to take a singular verb. But headlinese allows you to read them as separate items lacking “and,” and thus to use a plural verb.

Here’s an example, a clue we used a year or two ago that would not be acceptable to everyone:
   Tubers (potatoes) ultimately can come back (4)
The cryptic reading has “potatoes ultimately can” coming back—but gives it a plural verb (“come back”). This can be justified by interpreting “potatoes ultimately” and “can” as two items in a list joined only by an implicit comma. This recent clue works the same way:
   In hindsight, vaccines rarely contain poison (7)

The other main aspect of headlinese is its lack of articles. In normal, non-headline English, for example, the title of this post might read, “A local man actually eats a calendar”. Similarly, the English sentence “A change is seen by observers in some neutral territories” might become this headlinese clue:
   Change seen in neutral territories (5)

Clues with headlinese surface are not uncommon. The surface reading of a clue suffers a bit from the lack of articles, but cryptic constructors accept this in order to avoid possible red herrings. Is the inclusion of the article for a better surface reading worth the risk of being misinterpreted?

This is not a matter of correctness; the clue is correct either way. Dictionaries almost always use an article as part of the definition for a noun, and there is no reason for cryptic constructors to be holier than lexicographers. (Likewise, dictionaries often include “to” when defining a verb, which leads to a similar situation for clue writers.)

But because there is no consistency on this, even within a single puzzle, it can be a source of confusion. As we mentioned in previous posts, there is a broad consensus among US cryptic constructors, as well as many in the UK, that the solution to a cryptic clue ought to be unique. Thus, upon seeing the following clue by Cox and Rathvon, one of us unhesitatingly entered TORT into the diagram:
   A bakery choice pronounced wrong (4)
TORT (wrong) is a homophone of TORTE, which is a bakery choice. However, this was not the intended answer! To complete the puzzle, one had to enter AWRY, a homophone of A RYE, which is a bakery choice. In this case, the presence of “a” in the clue was necessary to the cryptic reading.

As a solver, you should always be aware that “a” (or “to”) may contribute to the cryptic reading—or it may not! In the end, we see inclusion or omission of “a” or “to” as one area where we must make judgment calls. Sometimes we include them, sometimes not. We apologize to those of you who would want an ironclad rule for this. Fortunately or unfortunately, there isn’t one.

Solutions to the clues: ALMANAC (hidden), YAMS (reversal), ARSENIC (hidden reversal), ALTER (hidden).

How do you feel about headlinese? Please share here, along with any quibbles, questions, kudos or complaints about the current puzzle or any previous puzzle. To comment (and see other readers’ comments), please click on this post’s title and scroll to the bottom of the resulting screen.

And here are three links:
• The current puzzle
• Our puzzle-solving guidelines
• A Nation puzzle solver’s blog where you can ask for and offer hints, and where every one of our clues is explained in detail.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read, just one of the many incisive, deeply-reported articles we publish daily. Now more than ever, we need fearless journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media.

Throughout this critical election year and a time of media austerity and renewed campus activism and rising labor organizing, independent journalism that gets to the heart of the matter is more critical than ever before. Donate right now and help us hold the powerful accountable, shine a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug, and build a more just and equitable future.

For nearly 160 years, The Nation has stood for truth, justice, and moral clarity. As a reader-supported publication, we are not beholden to the whims of advertisers or a corporate owner. But it does take financial resources to report on stories that may take weeks or months to properly investigate, thoroughly edit and fact-check articles, and get our stories into the hands of readers.

Donate today and stand with us for a better future. Thank you for being a supporter of independent journalism.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x