Boy Scouts Reaffirm Discrimination Against Gays

Boy Scouts Reaffirm Discrimination Against Gays

Boy Scouts Reaffirm Discrimination Against Gays

Call for an end to blatant discrimination in an organization that has an enormous influence on the lives of many children.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

This morning came the unfortunate news that after a confidential two-year review, the Boy Scouts of America has emphatically reaffirmed its policy of excluding both gay youth and gay troop leaders.

The Boy Scouts’ chief executive, Bob Mazzuca, defended the policy, contending that most Scout families support the policy: “The vast majority of the parents of youth we serve value their right to address issues of same-sex orientation within their family, with spiritual advisers and at the appropriate time and in the right setting,” Mazzuca told ABC. “We fully understand that no single policy will accommodate the many diverse views among our membership or society.”

Since at least 2000, the Boy Scouts have been targeted with numerous protest campaigns and run afoul of several local nondiscrimination laws because of its long-standing membership policy, which was upheld by the Supreme Court in 2000 in a 5-4 decision and has remained hotly contested ever since.

One of the most well-known protest campaigns highlighted the discrimination faced by Jennifer Tyrrell, an Ohio mother of a 7-year-old Cub Scout who was unceremoniously ousted as a Scout den mother because of her sexual preference.

In an eloquent petition letter, Tyrrell detailed her work as a den mother and called for an end to blatant discrimination in an organization that has an enormous influence on the lives of many children, especially those living outside of major urban areas.

Join more than 300,000 fellow concerned citizens who have added their name to Tyrrell’s call. The petition is meant to be delivered to the Scouts’ national headquarters in Irving, Texas, this week, so don’t delay. After you’ve weighed in, share this post with tour friends, family and Facebook and Twitter communities.

 

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x