Why Didn’t Wisconsin’s Teaching Assistants’ Association Endorse Any Candidate in Today’s Election?

Why Didn’t Wisconsin’s Teaching Assistants’ Association Endorse Any Candidate in Today’s Election?

Why Didn’t Wisconsin’s Teaching Assistants’ Association Endorse Any Candidate in Today’s Election?

This Tuesday, as Wisconsinites voted in primaries to replace Governor Scott Walker and five other statewide office holders, the union of graduate students at the heart of the 2011 Capitol protests, stood apart from their union fellows, and refused to endorse any candidate.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

This Tuesday, as Wisconsinites went to the polls to vote in primaries to replace Governor Scott Walker and five other statewide office holders, the union of graduate students at the heart of the 2011 Capitol protests that sparked the recall stood apart from their union fellows and refused to endorse any candidate.

The Teaching Assistants’ Association (TAA) the union of graduate student workers at the University of Wisconsin–Madison, kicked off the 2011 Capitol protests. Their Valentine’s Day rally and their call to keep the Capitol open for public testimony on Governor Walker’s proposed attacks on union rights, public education and public services led to the recall movement that has forced the governor, lieutenant governor and four state senators to face new elections. The process began this Tuesday, as Wisconsinites went to the polls to vote in primaries. The TAA was in the thick of things again, but not because they were rallying people behind their chosen candidate. Rather, because the union had refused to do just that.

Salon’s Josh Eidelson summarized the points of contention this way:

At issue is whether the union should support a candidate who hasn’t pledged to restore cuts to public workers’ wages and benefits — one of the criteria the TAA originally listed as a a prerequisite for an endorsement. [Former Dane County Executive Kathleen] Falk, who entered the race in January, is the only candidate who has pledged to veto any budget that doesn’t restore collective bargaining rights. But she also frequently touts the $10 million in concessions that she secured in negotiations with local unions as county executive. [Milwaukee Mayor Tom] Barrett…is more problematic when it comes to cuts: Last year, as the debate over collective bargaining raged, he told a conservative radio host that he opposed Walker’s collective bargaining changes but supported his proposed cuts.

Falk was the union favorite, securing endorsements from WEAC, AFSCME, SEIU and the TAA’s parent union, AFT-Wisconsin. In debating an endorsement, the TAA fell into divided camps with the union’s Political Education Committee and one of two co-president’s voting to get behind Falk. Co-president Adrienne Pagac opposed making an endorsement. I caught up with Pagac this weekend, where she spoke at a conference convened by Labor Notes. Unions have developed a well-oiled machine to get their members to the polls. What they haven’t built is the on-the-ground might to produce candidates who share their priorities, she argued. The TAA majority refused to split their union priorities from their priorities as Wisconsinites, equally affected by slashes to public budgets as they are to attacks on public workers’ rights. Here are Pagac’s comments just days before Tuesday’s vote.

Where Wisconsin is already, the nation is headed soon, namely into an election. Substitute TAA for Occupy, or the radical movement of your choice—and you have the quadrennial quandary for radicals in a nutshell. Or, possibly, a cheesehead hat.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x