Scott Walker Admits His Defeat Would Stall the GOP’s Anti-Labor Push

Scott Walker Admits His Defeat Would Stall the GOP’s Anti-Labor Push

Scott Walker Admits His Defeat Would Stall the GOP’s Anti-Labor Push

Walker has told allies there’s “no doubt” that Republican governors would back off attacks on unions if he loses.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Even Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker was acknowledging Tuesday that the one million signatures that had been gathered on petitions seeking his recall and removal from office were all but certain to force him to face a new election.

Walker still thinks he will win that election.

But if he loses, and polling suggests that is a very real prospect, Walker has admitted that the anti-GOP agenda of Republican governors and presidential candidates will be dealt a blow.

Indeed, Walker suggests, Republican governors will be less inclined to attack public-sector unions. And he suggests that Democratic governors will also recognize that assaults on the rights, the benefits and the pensions of state, county and municipal employees and teachers are politically unwise.

During a recent appearance at the Reagan Ranch in California—on one of the many trips out of Wisconsin where Walker has combined addresses to right-wing groups with fund-raising pitches to wealthy conservatives—Walker was asked whether he thought pushback from unions and their allies in Wisconsin, Ohio and other states would cause Republican politicians to dial down the anti-labor rhteoric and their “battles with public employee unions.”

“I think it really largely depends on what happens in the recalls in Wisconsin—the attempt at least in the next several months against me,” Walker replied. “If somehow that was successful then I think there’s no doubt about it.”

Walker is painting his fight to save his job as a defining moment in the national wrangling over labor rights.

“If we uphold not only me but the legislative majorities in the state Assembly and state Senate in Wisconsin, even after the tens of millions of dollars thrown at our legislative candidates and against me, I think most folks [will continue taking on unions]—even those in other parties; and remember, it’s not just myself and Kasich and other Republican governors, you got even of late Jerry Brown talking about pension reform, you’ve got Andrew Cuomo talking about it in New York, you even have Rahm Emanuel, the mayor of Chicago, talking about it in the city of Chicago,” said Walker.

Wisconsin’s governor is right.

The recall fight in Wisconsin poses a threat not just to his anti-labor policies—and the cuts in public education and public services funding that go with them—but those of other politicians in both parties. If Walker is defeated in the recall election that is likely to play out this spring or summer, the signal will be recognized even in the presidential race.

The likely GOP nominee, Mitt Romney, has made attacks on labor unions central to his campaign. He is even airing anti-unions ads in South Carolina.

If Walker loses, as Ohio’s Kasich did when voters overturned his attacks on collective bargaining in last November’s referendum vote, it is hard to imagine that Romney will head into battleground states such as Wisconsin and Ohio with a union-bashing message. Even the most rigid Republican has to recognize that voters who reject a Republican governor who has already attacked labor rights would not be inclined to elect a Republican president who promises to attack labor rights.

So it is that the Wisconsin recall vote is likely to define the politics not merely of a state but a nation.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x