Republicans Against the War: The Ranks Grow

Republicans Against the War: The Ranks Grow

Republicans Against the War: The Ranks Grow

The GOP is getting restless on Afghanistan.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Okay, Jon Huntsman isn’t going to be president. But he will announce his intention to run soon, which reminds me of my favorite political story about running for president in the New Hampshire primary. Back when Moe Udall was running, he stopped into a barber shop and said, “I’m Moe Udall, and I’m running for president.” And one of the men inside said, “Yes, we were just laughing about that this morning!”

Even so, it’s interesting that Huntsman is pushing President Obama for a faster pullout from Afghanistan:

“When you look at Afghanistan, can we hang out until 2014 and beyond? You can, if you’re willing to pay another quarter of a trillion dollars to do so.… If it isn’t in our direct national security interest and if there isn’t a logical exit strategy and if we don’t know what the cost is going to be in terms of money and human lives, then I think you have to say it’s probably time we re-evaluate this. My hunch is the American people want to be out of there as quickly as we can get it done.”

Unlike kooks such as Ron Paul, Huntsman is a mainstream candidate, even if he doesn’t appeal well to the ideologues who dominate primaries. Still, it’s really important that this is happening inside the GOP. If the Republicans are smart, they’ll start calling it “Obama’s war,” and point out that President Bush didn’t bother to send many troops there.

Meanwhile, though the Washington Post editorial page this weekend demanded that Obama keep as many troops there as long as possible, other Republicans are not happy with what’s going on, too, Senator Bob Corker of Tennessee, one of the top Republicans on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said that the war is not sustainable, adding:

“We’ve got this huge nation-building effort under way [and] I think if our citizens saw our footprint in Afghanistan, saw what was happening there from the standpoint of all the things we’re investing in thiscountry, the distortions in its culture—we’ve got to change our footprint.”

Like this blog post? Read it on The Nation’s free iPhone App, NationNow.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x