Documenting the Obama Administration’s ‘Gitmo in the Heartland’

Documenting the Obama Administration’s ‘Gitmo in the Heartland’

Documenting the Obama Administration’s ‘Gitmo in the Heartland’

The Obama Administration has continued to operate Bush’s legally-dubious detention centers for terrorism prisoners, but the opaque practices at these secret prisons deserve to be rigorously reconsidered.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

In 2006, the Bush Administration opened Communications Management Unit prisons in Marion, Illinois and Terre Haute, Indiana. These unusual units, with their extreme practices and secrecy, make up a kind of "Gitmo in the heartland," as The Nation‘s Alia Malek reports in a recent issue of the magazine. Originally created to isolate inmates suspected of having ties to terrorism, the units have come under scrutiny for the make-up of the detainee population: the majority of the inmates are Arab, and prison officials have started importing prisoners from the general prison population in an effort to cover up the skewed demographics.

On WNYC’s Leonard Lopate Show, Malek recounts how “an Iraqi-American physician, who had been sent to jail for violating Iraqi sanctions because he was sending medicine to Iraq,” was able to get a letter out confirming that most inmates are “Arab.” Another prisoner, Daniel, was a “low security” risk who was detained for his involvement in environmental terrorism. He had “exemplary” status in a prison in Minnesota but was suddenly sent to a restrictive unit in Marion with little explanation for the move. Malek says that non-Arab, non-Muslim inmates like Daniel are being sent to the CMUs as “balancers” who add a veneer of legitimacy to these legally-dubious prisons.

The Obama Administration has continued to operate the Bush-era CMUs, Malek says, but the opaque practices at these secret prisons deserve to be rigorously reconsidered.

—Kevin Gosztola

Support The Nation’s June Fundraising Campaign

With the midterm elections now firmly upon us, the question is whether Democratic candidates will do more than merely occupy ballot lines as mild alternatives to the red-hot crisis that is Donald Trump.

As Trump spends over $1 billion a day on a globally destabilizing war on Iran and admits that he doesn’t “think about Americans’ financial situation,” millions across the country are struggling with the surging costs of essentials. Democrats must seize this moment and advance bold, small-“d” populist ideas—not settle for cynical caution that once again snatches defeat from the jaws of victory.

The Nation elevates progressive ideas, movements, and elected officials achieving real change across the country into the national conversation. At the same time, our journalists are exposing how crypto and AI-funded super PACs are spending hundreds of millions of dollars to knock out candidates they oppose, reporting on the devastating impact of the Supreme Court’s evisceration of the Voting Rights Act, and sounding the alarm on attempts by red states to quickly redraw electoral maps, disenfranchising Southern Black voters.

We can play this critical role because of support from readers like you. This June, we’re raising $20,000 to power The Nation’s independent journalism in the run-up to November’s immensely consequential elections.

It’s in our power to build a more just society, and your support at this critical moment brings us closer to that bold vision. I hope you’ll donate today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Huevel
Editor and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x