The Breakdown: Is the Federal Deficit Actually Bad for Our Economy?

The Breakdown: Is the Federal Deficit Actually Bad for Our Economy?

The Breakdown: Is the Federal Deficit Actually Bad for Our Economy?

Would getting rid of the federal deficit be the silver bullet for our ailing economy? Robert Pollin explains why the standard arguments against deficit spending don’t tell the whole truth.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Why, exactly, is the federal government deficit a bad thing? We’ve all heard the numerous objections: the deficit increases interest burdens, contributes to currency inflation and leaves us in debt to foreign states and investors. But why has deficit spending, as we’re told, suddenly reached “crisis” level? On this week’s edition of The Breakdown, DC Editor Chris Hayes and economist Robert Pollin talk about why the standard arguments against deficit spending don’t tell the whole truth, and why our economy is unhealthy for reasons other than simple debt accumulation.

Why, exactly, is the federal government deficit a bad thing? We’ve all heard the numerous objections: the deficit increases interest burdens, contributes to currency inflation and leaves us in debt to foreign states and investors. But why has deficit spending, as we’re told, suddenly reached “crisis” level? On this week’s edition of The Breakdown, DC Editor Chris Hayes and economist Robert Pollin discuss why the standard arguments against deficit spending don’t tell the whole truth, and why our economy is unhealthy for reasons other than simple debt accumulation.

Resources

Robert Pollin in The Boston Review on the moral imperative of full employment.
Pollin explains why austerity is not a solution [PDF].
Robert Pollin and Jeffrey Thompson on the betrayal of public workers in this week’s issue of The Nation.

Subscribe to The Breakdown on iTunes to listen to fresh takes on the confusing concepts that make politics, economics and government tick. A new episode every week!

Support The Nation’s June Fundraising Campaign

With the midterm elections now firmly upon us, the question is whether Democratic candidates will do more than merely occupy ballot lines as mild alternatives to the red-hot crisis that is Donald Trump.

As Trump spends over $1 billion a day on a globally destabilizing war on Iran and admits that he doesn’t “think about Americans’ financial situation,” millions across the country are struggling with the surging costs of essentials. Democrats must seize this moment and advance bold, small-“d” populist ideas—not settle for cynical caution that once again snatches defeat from the jaws of victory.

The Nation elevates progressive ideas, movements, and elected officials achieving real change across the country into the national conversation. At the same time, our journalists are exposing how crypto and AI-funded super PACs are spending hundreds of millions of dollars to knock out candidates they oppose, reporting on the devastating impact of the Supreme Court’s evisceration of the Voting Rights Act, and sounding the alarm on attempts by red states to quickly redraw electoral maps, disenfranchising Southern Black voters.

We can play this critical role because of support from readers like you. This June, we’re raising $20,000 to power The Nation’s independent journalism in the run-up to November’s immensely consequential elections.

It’s in our power to build a more just society, and your support at this critical moment brings us closer to that bold vision. I hope you’ll donate today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editor and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x