Human Rights Experts Condemn Chinese Repression of Tibetan Buddhists

Human Rights Experts Condemn Chinese Repression of Tibetan Buddhists

Human Rights Experts Condemn Chinese Repression of Tibetan Buddhists

China usually manages to quash UN calls for action on its human rights violations. Not this time.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

In the United Nations system, the heavyweight member countries more often than not can avoid or quash calls for action on human rights violations. This is particularly true of the permanent five members of the Security Council: China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States. China, for example, effectively bars the Dalai Lama from ever entering UN premises, even for ecumenical gatherings of the world’s religious leaders.

Thus it was unusual to see six leading international human rights experts fielded by the UN Human Rights Council acting jointly recently to condemn Chinese repression and harassment of Tibetan Buddhists in Sichuan province, where there is a significant ethnic Tibetan population and numerous monasteries. The sharp criticisms came from monitors on freedom of religion, freedom of opinion and expression, involuntary disappearances, arbitrary detention, minority rights and the right to freedom of assembly and association.

The monitors – all internationally recognized experts who are unpaid, independent investigators and not UN officials — faulted China for what they call “severe human rights restrictions” in a region where tensions have been rising since the spring and where monks, nuns and lay people have turned to protests and self-immolation. The Kirti monastery, with 2,500 monks, has been a particular target of Chinese intimidation. But surveillance, a heavily armed security presence inside as well as around monasteries, arrests and disappearances are taking place in other locations also.

Heiner Bielefeldt, the UN Human Rights Council “special rapporteur” on freedom of religion, said in his report that heavy-handed Chinese tactics are only exacerbating existing tensions in the province. He called the intimidation in Sichuan “counterproductive.”

 

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x