On Hill and the Thomases: How Far Have We Come?

On Hill and the Thomases: How Far Have We Come?

On Hill and the Thomases: How Far Have We Come?

Anita Hill may not have stopped Clarence Thomas from being confirmed to the Supreme Court, but in the wake of her accusations, our culture changed. Or did it, really?

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Virginia Thomas’s bizarre early-morning voice mail message to Anita Hill, suggesting she apologize for "what you did with my husband" nineteen years ago, brought the Clarence Thomas confirmation hearings back in all their riveting, enraging glory.

Who could forget Long Dong Silver, the all-male judiciary committee that just "didn’t get it," Thomas’s famous charge that he was the victim of a "high-tech lynching for uppity blacks"?

Hill may not have stopped Thomas from being narrowly confirmed, 52–48, but she had other victories: she directly inspired the so-called Year of the Woman in 1992, which brought record numbers of women into Congress; and, although a New York Times/CBS poll found that only 24 percent believed Hill and 58 percent believed Thomas, her calm dignity in the face of boorish and dismissive questioning brought sexual harassment into the spotlight as it had never been before. As more and more women from all walks of life went public with their own painful and humiliating experiences, laws changed, business practices changed, and the culture changed too.

Or did it, really? After all, the upcoming election, also heralded as a Year of the Woman, features high-profile hard-right Republican women—to say nothing of Republican men—who are campaigning to turn back the clock on a range of women’s rights. Virginia Thomas herself is the founder and head of Liberty Central, a Tea Party–related activist group, and it’s tempting to wonder if her phone message was not an impulse call born of long-simmering grievance, and maybe an ill-timed martini as well, but a political move: dredging up Anita Hill, now a professor at Brandeis, to remind voters of the horrors of Democratic control and, especially, feminism.

In the broader culture, sexual insults to women are discussed more openly, but also uttered more brazenly. "Bitch" and "ho" are practically synonyms for "female"; sexist jeers at female politicians are the stock in trade of radio and TV hosts from Keith Olbermann on the left to Glenn Beck on the right. At Yale last week, pledges to the Delta Kappa Epsilon fraternity paraded around campus shouting "no means yes, yes means anal" and "I f – – – dead women." The Yale administration has yet to officially condemn this outrageous spectacle, and an editorial in the Yale Daily News chastised the university Women’s Center as "histrionic" for describing it as "an active call for sexual violence" rather than simply an immature, tasteless stunt by "members of our community" (unlike the feminists?). It’s a discouraging thought that the Dekes and the editorial writers are tomorrow’s employers—and maybe, the way things are going, tomorrow’s senators and Supreme Court justices, too.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x