The Breakdown: The Great Climate Debate

The Breakdown: The Great Climate Debate

The Breakdown: The Great Climate Debate

Global warming is not just controversial, it’s also pretty confusing. As world leaders debate in Copenhagen, politicians in Congress are pushing different plans to deal with climate change. Christopher Hayes breaks down the difference between cap and trade and a carbon tax.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email
The Breakdown

Krugman vs. Hansen! Lieberman vs. Collins! Cap and trade vs. carbon tax! Global warming is not just controversial, it’s also pretty confusing. As world leaders squabble in Copenhagen, politicians in Congress are pushing different plans to deal with climate change. To help make sense of the debate, The Nation‘s Washington, D.C. Editor Christopher Hayes breaks down the difference between a cap and trade plan and a carbon tax.

Related Links

James Hansen, Storms of My Grandchildren

James Hansen, Cap and Fade

Paul Krugman, The Unhelpful Hansen

David Roberts, What to Make of the Cantwell/Collins CLEAR Act

N. Gregory Mankiw, A Missed Opportunity on Climate Change

Note: This is the beta launch of a new audio feature from The Nation, "The Breakdown with Christopher Hayes." Each week we’ll take questions from readers about confusing terms you’re hearing in the news, and then we’ll choose one to demystify! This is also the beta launch of our new audio player. We welcome and encourage your feedback about the new feature and the audio player. Please send comments to radionation [at] thenation [dot] com. If you would like to submit a question for the first 2010 edition of "The Breakdown," tweet Christopher Hayes, @chrislhayes, or email thebreakdown [at] thenation [dot] com.

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x