Quantcast

Web Letters | The Nation

Web Letter

Finally! Rachel Maddow is a female counterpart to Stephen Colbert. I would love to see those two go head to head in a debate. They both have the gift of gab and an eye for the absurd, fearlessly claim freedom of speech, and tell it like it is. Love ya, guys. Rock on!

Maggie Arackelian

Los Angeles, CA

Jan 4 2009 - 9:24pm

Web Letter

At 85 I've been listening to TV and radio for a long time and never have I heard a more refreshing, unhidden bias, informed commentator. She is attractive and intelligent with a wonderful sense of humor that reminds us all not to take life too seriously lest we had it wrong. Don't let her leave the airwaves.

Daniel Long

Salem, OR

Nov 3 2008 - 11:33pm

Web Letter

I look so forward to Rachel's honest, direct, funny delivery of the days political news... never have before! I like her clean, damn if they don't like me attitude and commentary. She is a very fresh face... not to mention honest and soooo well informed. Love her show and can't wait for lots more zingers. Hooray and more Hooray. Rachel makes this election palatable and zeros in on what's important with a great sense of humor as well. More, More. More.

Tosca Giorgi

San Francisco, CA

Sep 17 2008 - 12:09pm

Web Letter

Thank you for your article on Rachel Maddow. My husband and I have loved her insightful comments since we first saw her. NBC is making a smart decision, as we need more hosts that question the status quo. Most news reporting is so lacking in every way: one, it is the same news being reported on every channel; and two, it is totally biased and promotes "talking points" instead of questioning our government and its policies and informing the general public. Hiring Maddow is a move toward intelligent dialogue regarding important issues instead of the lurid minutia that seems to have invaded our daily lives. It is time to put the American interests first, and we know that Rachel will do that. Thankfully, we have Olberman and now Maddow. Phil Donahue would approve.

Shirley Esquivel

Miami Lakes, FL

Aug 21 2008 - 11:42pm

Web Letter

I have watched Rachel since her inception on MSNBC and have been an ardent fan from day one, so you must forgive my enthusiasm.

While reading Rebecca Traister’s bio it occurred to me that, with the untimely death of Tim Russert, MSNBC had in their hands someone with the same kind of sunny persona and capability. Someone with the ability to take facts, dissect them and use them, not in a mean or hateful way, but use them to get to the truth in an answer (ask Chris Matthews about this one).

I would go back to watching Meet the Press with her there.

J.W. Barnett

San Diego, CA

Aug 9 2008 - 4:23pm

Web Letter

Rachel Maddow is indeed a clear thinker and a good left-wing pundit to join the ever expanding liberal tribe of Matthews, Barnacle, Abrams, Gregory and the rabid left of liberal Olberman. But with all the bluster of merit thrown at Ms. Maddow, it was Tucker Carlson that tapped her for the front. No-one would have figure that after reading this Nation piece.

Hugh Maguire

New York, NY

Aug 9 2008 - 3:35pm

Web Letter

The hatchet job Maddow and Olbermann did on Dana Milbank wasn't different from the one, back in the 1857, carried out by disguised Mormons against more than 120 settlers and not excluding infants in their mothers' arms.

Barack Obama, would-be Democratic ambassador to the world, isn't enough of a leader even to take back from Nancy Pelosi his people's right to impeach Bush, and whether those people would impeach Bush in order to end the war or for any other of the many reasons why they'd impeach him.

This might be a good time to remind ourselves that Maddow, Olbermann, Obama, Pelosi and even Bruce Springsteen all figure their income taxes according to a form which is not labeled Democrat.

Cameron Jones

Indiana, PA

Aug 6 2008 - 10:42am

Web Letter

I know that a lot of people would like the troops out pronto and that includes me, my husband is active duty army, but you cannot move the army any faster. I like Ms. Maddow very much and enjoy her comments, but when it comes to moving the troops out of Iraq, it will take time. They bring lots of equipment they would have to tear down and pack up, tons of stuff, and keep everyone safe while they do it. We are talking about seven years in Iraq so far. Just to make a point, when a unit is getting close to redeployment to come back home it takes 120 days to pack out and account for all the equipment, and that includes doing your regular duty. I support Sen. Obama, so do a lot of my close friends who are army wives, and we are very aware of the cost of this war in Iraq, we see the human cost of it every day.

Rhonda Fraser

Fayetteville, NC

Aug 4 2008 - 6:08pm

Web Letter

I've watched Rachel for several weeks now as I peruse the news channels looking for the most objective commentators. She does have a clear, insightful mind, although she takes great sarcastic delight in attacking conservatism in almost any form. As an "Air America" type this is known and understandable, though it renders her opinions too subjective to be taken very seriously and makes her, like her right-wing counterpart O'Reilly, part of America's polarization problem.

William Harry

Timonium, MD

Aug 4 2008 - 3:49pm

Web Letter

I watch Rachel whenever, however, possible. this gal has a clear, clean-thinking mind that is unafraid of going solo into the dark night of television spin and shine a clear light of logic. She never seems to need to explain any statement that she makes--every sentence seems to stand alone and correct.

James Pinette

Caribou, ME

Aug 2 2008 - 11:49pm