The US Must Prioritize Children’s Safe and Legal Resettlement

The US Must Prioritize Children’s Safe and Legal Resettlement

The US Must Prioritize Children’s Safe and Legal Resettlement

This country has made immigration a “security” issue rather than a “humanitarian” issue, painting child migrants as violent threats rather than vulnerable youth.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

In 2013, Wendy and her sister crossed the border on a bus into the United States hoping to reunify with their mother. When Border Patrol agents stopped them and asked for papers the girls didn’t have, they were taken off the bus and placed in handcuffs. Wendy and her sister spent days, their wrists and ankles shackled, in freezing-cold holding cells commonly called hieleras—iceboxes. They huddled together under their Mylar blankets to try to keep warm.

The way Wendy and her sister were treated is the result of a system designed to punish migrant children and deter them from seeking lawful protections in this country, and in the process dehumanize and traumatize them.

I represented Wendy and her sister in their fight against deportation as a staff attorney for the children’s program at RAICES, which provides free legal services to children applying for immigration relief. For nearly a decade, I’ve worked as a lawyer representing children in their deportation proceedings, fighting for them to remain in the United States with their loved ones.

I’ve seen firsthand how US policy has failed children when it comes to migration. This country has made immigration a “security” issue rather than a “humanitarian” issue, painting child migrants as violent threats rather than vulnerable youth and perpetuating a vicious cycle of detaining, abusing, and deporting them. What does it say about a country that restricts water for children in detention, and puts young girls in handcuffs in the name of border security? Why do we need protection from children like Wendy and her sister? What are we afraid of? 

When people approach me about my work, they often ask: Why do these children come? While there are complex answers that get into “push and pull factors,” the simple truth is they come because they want what all children want: safety, family, and the chance for a better life. 

Child migration is nothing new. My own grandmother, Angelita, was 16 when she first crossed into the United States. She and her family moved to Texas when her father abandoned them, and she began working at a young age to help support her family. Angelita and her brothers would be rounded up while working and deported to Mexico. Once, Angelita was separated from her brother and she ended up alone and stranded on the Mexican side of the border. When Angelita was separated from her family, there was no official policy instructing Border Patrol agents to separate children from parents, nor was there widespread news coverage decrying such separations. Despite these hardships, she was eventually able to immigrate to the United States legally and become a citizen.

Wendy and Angelita are generations apart, but their stories echo each other. Both of these young women were victims of family separation, before there was a name for it. Neither had nefarious plans to exploit the US immigration system. They were children—children who had  faced challenges and struggles that no child should have to endure. Little has improved since, and, as clearly evidenced by the images of overcrowded cells and children telling stories of being denied access to a clean bathroom or shower, in many ways the system has become much worse.

Instead of trying to solve a global phenomenon with border walls and overcrowded facilities, the structure we build and policies we put into place should be child-centered and human-oriented. We should start seeing migrant children as children, not as numbers or a crisis. Instead of subjecting them to deportation proceedings, we should be finding ways to support their successful, legal resettlement into the United States. If we were to support and prioritize the safety of each child, if we provided trauma-informed services that focused on children’s resilience and potential to succeed, then perhaps we could break down the cycles of poverty and abuse that led them to make the dangerous journey in the first place. 

Angelita died a US citizen, and her granddaughter became a lawyer who fights for children’s rights. Wendy is a mother now and has recently applied to be a US citizen.  When asked what she would do if she ever found any child in a situation like the one she was in, or the one my grandmother was in more than half a century before her,  Wendy answered that she would “look after them and keep them safe.” And isn’t that the answer that any US citizen would give? Isn’t that the way we as Americans believe we should treat all children, no matter where they were born?

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x