Politics / Hiding in Plain Sight / December 12, 2025

It Would Be Madness to Give Trump and His Toadies Even More Power

And yet, that’s what the Supreme Court appears prepared to do.

Sasha Abramsky
Attorney General Pam Bondi, Vice President JD Vance, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem flank Donald Trump during an executive order signing in the Oval Office, on August 25, 2025.

Attorney General Pam Bondi, Vice President JD Vance, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem flank Donald Trump during an executive order signing in the Oval Office, on August 25, 2025.

(Al Drago / Bloomberg via Getty Images)

This week, the Supreme Court made clear that it was likely going to rule in favor of Donald Trump’s right to summarily fire board members of supposedly independent regulatory agencies. If and when such a ruling comes down from the hard-right justices who dominate the court, it will unravel basic government structures and guardrails that have been in place for almost a century. It will also hand even more executive power to a wannabe autocrat who has no internal moral braking mechanism and is already armed with the shameful Supreme Court ruling that he is immune from prosecution for acts committed in an official capacity. It will, quite simply, be a green light for capricious, corrupt, revenge-based politicking, and for the dismantling of the regulatory structures and government agencies established under law by Congress.

In all the key government departments and agencies, Trump uses his hiring and firing powers to tame honorable public servants and to replace them with the most amoral, pliant, sycophantic—and frequently grossly incompetent—men and women he can find. It’s as if he’s been given a who’s who of toadies and been told he can browse through the list to choose the very worst of the worst.

Hence the extraordinary events of the past weeks. America’s Caligula may not have made his horse a US senator, but he’s had no problem making his horse’s ass, willing to conjure up whatever war crimes du jour the boss orders, defense secretary. Witness the allegations that Pete Hegseth issued verbal “kill them all” orders regarding America’s rampaging assassination campaign against alleged drug mules in the Caribbean and Pacific.

Or look at Trump’s repeated use of the most foul, racist, and demeaning descriptions of the Somali American population. Instead of DHS Secretary Kristi Noem resigning in horror at how the presidency is being tarnished through the use of Hitlerian language, she has sought to out-compete Trump by issuing her own social media postings that are, somehow, even more odious. One of them, in particular, is worth quoting in full: “I just met with the President. I am recommending a full travel ban on every damn country that’s been flooding our nation with killers, leeches, and entitlement junkies. Our forefathers built this nation on blood, sweat, and the unyielding love of freedom—not for foreign invaders to slaughter our heroes, suck dry our hard-earned tax dollars, or snatch the benefits owed to AMERICANS. WE DON’T WANT THEM. NOT ONE.”

Forget the soaring oratory of an FDR or a JFK. This isn’t even the language of a Reagan or a Nixon. Rather, it’s the guttural mewling of an insecure underling desperate to get the schoolyard bully’s attention by throwing in a few punches of their own against the friendless kids in the corner. This is what happens when government is captured by gangsters.

Similarly, the government’s new National Security Strategy—which explicitly allies the US with fascist parties in Europe, largely sides with Russia over Ukraine, and declares it to be a US national security priority to limit migration into Europe and thus “save Western Civilization”—ought to have had every staffer at the State Department, from Marco Rubio (a son of immigrants, it is worth repeatedly shouting from the rooftops) on down running pell-mell for the exits. But instead, they all hunkered down, made their peace with this mad statement of intent, and sat back as the rest of the world gasped in astonishment at America’s priorities in the Trump era.

Current Issue

Cover of April 2026 Issue

When news broke mid-week that Customs and Border Protection was going to start demanding five years of social media access, e-mail addresses, and a tranche of personal data for visa applicants from the 42 countries—mainly made up of America’s closest allies—whose citizens can currently apply online for a US tourist visa, and who can currently get that visa within a matter of hours, there was nary a peep from any Trump officials or GOP members of Congress; no matter that this could shred the US tourism industry, or that it could lead other countries to enact similarly invasive visa restrictions on Americans seeking to travel abroad. The boss and his henchmen want to wall off the country from the rest of the world, so it shall be done.

This is truly senescent autocracy; it is the peculiarly toxic combination of Trump’s instinct to personalize all power and what looks at this point to be a raging, impulsive, senility. And yet, no one is standing up and saying “enough already.”

What would it look like if the Supreme Court does indeed concentrate even more power in this vicious old man’s hands, allowing him to fire any and every federal employee on a middle-of-the-night whim? Ask Abby McIlraith and Declan Crowe, two of the FEMA employees who signed the Katrina Declaration warning of the risk of epic disasters because of the evisceration of the agency they work at. Both were among the signatories who were summarily placed on administrative leave after the letter was published; both, in the days surrounding Thanksgiving, received notices from the Office of Professional Responsibility clearing them of wrongdoing and approving their return to work; and both were then immediately placed back on administrative leave by the Trump administration within hours of their getting back to their office.

The Nation Weekly

Fridays. A weekly digest of the best of our coverage.
By signing up, you confirm that you are over the age of 16 and agree to receive occasional promotional offers for programs that support The Nation’s journalism. You may unsubscribe or adjust your preferences at any time. You can read our Privacy Policy here.

What about the legally enshrined protections for whistleblowers? For the birds.

Speaking to The Nation in their capacities as private citizens, McIlraith and Crowe expressed dismay at the breakdown of institutional safeguards. “We want justice for whistleblowers,” Crowe told me this week. “Not just in FEMA but all organizations. When things like this happen, FEMA’s ability to provide services is weakened.”

For McIlraith, the vindictiveness of the government repeatedly placing employees on administrative leave—paying them but preventing them from working—made neither economic nor political sense. “It’s certainly not government efficiency to be paying us to not do our jobs. That’s pretty egregious,” she said.

McIlraith had just about enough time back at the office to make plans to attend the upcoming holiday party when she received word that she would have to leave again. “It was pretty odd,” she said, “not a great feeling; I’m concerned I’ll be fired for this and will have to get another job.”

Now imagine Trump being able to treat quite literally every public service employee, every independent regulatory agency board member, the same way. This isn’t a recipe for making America great again; as even this uniquely myopic Supreme Court should be able to see at this point, it is, rather, a road map to utter chaos and corruption.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Sasha Abramsky

Sasha Abramsky is the author of several books, including The American Way of PovertyThe House of Twenty Thousand Books, Little Wonder: The Fabulous Story of Lottie Dod, the World's First Female Sports Superstar, and Chaos Comes Calling: The Battle Against the Far-Right Takeover of Small-Town America. His latest book is American Carnage: How Trump, Musk, and DOGE Butchered the US Government.

More from The Nation

Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez articulates her vision of an anti authoritarian

Trump’s War in Iran Opens a Foreign Policy Debate Democrats Can No Longer Avoid Trump’s War in Iran Opens a Foreign Policy Debate Democrats Can No Longer Avoid

The war is forcing Democrats to confront a question they have long deferred: whether the party can offer a coherent anti-war alternative to Washington’s foreign policy consensus.

Blaise Malley

Disastrous Tides of Fortune

Disastrous Tides of Fortune Disastrous Tides of Fortune

The consequences of US actions on other nations.

OppArt / Peter Kuper

Should Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Run for President in 2028?

Should Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Run for President in 2028? Should Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Run for President in 2028?

David Faris argues that the New York representative is the new national leader the Democrats need, but Daraka Larimore-Hall claims she can get more done in Congress.

The Debate / David Faris and Daraka Larimore-Hall

Anti-AIPAC protesters in Farmington Hills, Michigan, on November 10, 2025.

Is AIPAC Doomed? Is AIPAC Doomed?

The hard-line pro-Israel lobby is facing more opposition than ever before. But fully defanging it won’t be easy.

Column / Jeet Heer

New York Police Commissioner Jessica Tisch briefs the press on the attack outside of Gracie Mansion as Mayor Zohran Mamdani looks on.

A Trial by Fire for Tisch and Mamdani, New York’s Premier Odd Couple A Trial by Fire for Tisch and Mamdani, New York’s Premier Odd Couple

How this weekend’s failed attack outside Gracie Mansion could reinforce the strange-bedfellows alliance between the mayor and the police commissioner.

D.D. Guttenplan

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei, chief product officer Mike Krieger and head of communications Sasha de Marigny give a press conference on May 22, 2025.

Anthropic’s Lawsuit Should Absolutely Destroy the Pentagon in Court Anthropic’s Lawsuit Should Absolutely Destroy the Pentagon in Court

But make no mistake: The company is not one of the good guys.

Elie Mystal