Letters From the September 5/12, 2022, Issue

Letters From the September 5/12, 2022, Issue

Letters From the September 5/12, 2022, Issue

Housing follies… A tale of two Nations… Protest in a new era…

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Housing Follies

Re “Does Building Luxury Condos Create More Affordable Housing?,” by Brian Hanlon, Tara Raghuveer, Ned Resnikoff, and John Washington [July 25/August 1]: Los Angeles is a perfect example of the folly of trying to solve a worsening housing crisis through the construction of market-rate housing. Most of the new housing is expensive and depends on zoning waivers for building permits. It also pulls up the price of nearby housing, pushing even more people out. The final result is that those neighborhoods with the most new market-rate housing also have large and growing homeless encampments—today’s Hoovervilles. Faced with the consequences of their failed supply-side housing policies and strong pushback from local residents upset at the encampments, officials have turned to the police to push the homeless to other streets.
Richard Platkin

A Tale of Two Nations

I recently received The Nation’s announcement about its upcoming trip to Cuba. It looks great—and bears absolutely no resemblance to the Nation article on Cuba in the July 25/August 1 issue [“Cuba 12 Months On,” by William M. LeoGrande]. Nowhere does that piece mention the disastrous impact of US sanctions on Cuba or the role of the US government, the National Endowment for Democracy, and the Cuban exile community in Miami in stirring up the “opposition” in Cuba on July 11, 2021. The Nation has been having a serious identity crisis for some time now. Along with David Klion’s feature on China some months back [“What Should the Left Do About China?,” January 24/31] and others, this article is one more example of the rightward pull of the magazine.
Nina Felshin

Protest in a New Era

Vanessa Williamson and Dana R. Fisher’s essay “Disruptive Politics” [June 27/July 4] calls on progressives to adopt “confrontational activism and civil disobedience” to bring about change. It is true that such tactics worked in the 1960s, helping to end the Vietnam War and pass the Civil Rights Act. But there are reasons to believe that protest and civil disobedience will be less effective in our current era. Activists who want the government to address climate change or militarism are likely to be outmaneuvered by powerful corporate and government actors committed to protecting their interests; that’s why protests against the 2003 invasion of Iraq were ineffective. The Black Lives Matter protests were overwhelmingly peaceful, but due to dishonest media coverage, many Americans believe that BLM and antifa are violent extremist movements. Furthermore, protesters are likely to be met by a large number of heavily armed right-wing counterprotesters. Unlike in the ’60s, when groups such as the KKK that opposed civil rights were marginalized, the dominant faction of the Republican Party is now aligned with Donald Trump and other white supremacists. This is not a call for surrender; it’s a wake-up call.
Donald A. Smith
bellevue, wash.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x