Why the Left Should Defend Obamacare

Why the Left Should Defend Obamacare

Yes, it was a flawed compromise. But to achieve universal, humane healthcare for all, we first need effective implementation of the ACA.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

The Affordable Care Act began life as a compromise—a complicated and frustrating political calculation—and it is never easy to defend a compromise. But failure to do so at this critical stage in the rollout of the ACA will create a crisis not just for healthcare in America but for the notion that government can and should repair the breaches that threaten civil and humane society.

When President Obama and Democratic leaders in Congress decided to expend political capital to address the absolute failure of the free market to provide affordable, readily available healthcare to tens of millions of working Americans, they took off the table the right response to the crisis—a single-payer, “Medicare for All” system. They believed the best reform was politically unachievable, so they cobbled together a hybrid of public regulation and private insurance that has come back to haunt them. Now, as the peddlers of junk insurance game the system to defend their profiteering, and as Republicans gleefully spin incoherent “told you so” fantasies, some Democrats are going weak in the knees. Thirty-nine of them in the House simply threw in with the Republicans on November 15 to back an attack on the basic premises of “Obamacare.”

There is no question that the drafting and design of the Affordable Care Act was flawed (the administration should not have sacrificed the public option, for example). Nor is there any question that the rollout of the government ACA website was disastrous. These problems, of course, must be addressed. But the “fixes” now on offer from Congressional Republicans are, at best, a mangling of the initial plan and, at worst, acts of sabotage that will fatally undermine the promise of quality coverage for the uninsured and underinsured.

These are the stakes. And they are too high for progressives simply to follow cues from a shaken administration and a divided Democratic caucus. Progressives must step in not only as ardent advocates for better implementation of the ACA—a relatively easy task—but also for structural repairs to the law that will make it a better bridge to the truly universal, truly humane and truly functional healthcare system that America needs.

Step one is triage: the government must get websites and outreach initiatives up to speed. Step two is vigorous defense against the dark arts of Republicans who have wedded their party’s limited future to the project of destroying not just Obamacare but Obama. A divided and dysfunctional Democratic response will only strengthen the hand of the Republicans in 2014.

So unity is called for—but it must be a thinking unity. Progressives must prod the administration and Democratic leaders to fight harder and smarter. It’s time to go on offense against Republican governors who have refused to expand Medicaid, shamefully shutting 5 million Americans out of coverage (see Richard Kim on page 10). It’s time to start talking up the expansion of public health programs that are part of the broader ACA agenda, and that will mend a torn safety net in communities across the country. And it’s time to embrace and encourage speedy application of new regulations that will rein in abusive and recalcitrant insurance companies.

Healthcare is a right, and reforming America’s broken system is a social and economic necessity. The Affordable Care Act is a modest reform, with flaws rooted in the compromises that shaped it. But it is not a compromise to fight for the ACA’s effective implementation. Indeed, winning that fight will make future reforms all the more possible.

In this week’s issue of The Nation, Richard Kim looks at the Republicans’s efforts to derail the Affordable Care Act.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x