White and Black Liberals Have ‘The Talk’ at Netroots Conference

White and Black Liberals Have ‘The Talk’ at Netroots Conference

White and Black Liberals Have ‘The Talk’ at Netroots Conference

The Shirley Sherrod imbroglio reverberates in Las Vegas, where a diverse group of progressive activists kicked off their fifth annual netroots conference.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Las Vegas
 
The fifth annual Netroots Nation kicked off in Las Vegas on Thursday, as liberal bloggers and activists gathered to organize and assess an Obama administration that continues to disappoint key planks of the left. One of the first panels, scheduled months ago, could have been ripped from today’s headlines about Shirley Sherrod: "Fighting the Right Wing with Racial Justice."

James Rucker, the cofounder of a netroots civil rights organization, told attendees that media personalities like Glenn Beck had to be "undressed" and combated in a platform that they don’t actually control. Rucker lamented that racial provocateurs like Andrew Breitbart, who does submit to interviews with traditional journalists, manage to get free press while escaping factual accountability.

An early, unscientific sampling of liberal conference attendees suggested a sour mood for the politics of the day. Across the hallways of The Rio, a bright, off-strip hotel that is budget but clean, people seemed pretty fed up with the entire Sherrod imbroglio. While the administration’s mistreatment of Sherrod does not meet the scale of foreign policy or financial reform, of course, the rushed, reflexive capitulation to disingenuous opponents dovetails with a caricature of Obama’s governing playbook, at least among some progressives.

Back in the racial justice panel, several speakers cast the Sherrod attack as politics as usual in the Obama age.

Rich Benjamin, who traveled through some of the most concentrated Caucasian neighborhoods in America for his book "Whitopia," proposed that racial tension lurked behind many of the domestic policy debates of the Obama era. "The healthcare debate was explicitly about race," he said, stressing how Joe Willson’s "You Lie" outburst focused on tapping anger towards the false fear that the government would fund healthcare for minority immigrants. (Benjamin is a friend of mine, by the way.)

And all the panelists agreed that there is scant space for a genuine "national conversation" on race right now.

"White liberals are afraid to death," Rucker contended, to have frank conversations about resilient racial divisions in America.

Another panelist echoed Eric Holder’s supposedly controversial observation that America shies away from racial dialogue. Tammy Johnson, a community organizer with the Applied Research Center, declared that today’s leaders, and Obama by implication, do not have the guts to address race head-on.

One conference attendee pushed back on those sentiments, however, during the question and answer session.

Davey D, a disc jockey for Hard Knock Radio, stressed that many people and potential leaders talk about race in substantive ways—they simply do not garner mainstream media coverage. And the whole point of building a new media structure, he reminded fellow activists, was to cover and amplify new voices, not to lament the status quo.

If everyone had already forgotten that, he stressed, then "it’s time to have a conversation with yourself."

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x