This Week: Stumbling Toward Sequestration

This Week: Stumbling Toward Sequestration

This Week: Stumbling Toward Sequestration

The $85 billion sequester will hurt our economy—and our people.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

At midnight last night $85 billion in federal budget funds were sequestered by the Treasury Department.

This week at The Nation, we looked at the human costs of the austerity measures about to be imposed on our country. Instead of obsessing over a manufactured deficit crisis, I argued, we should be focusing on putting financially battered Americans back to work. It’s time to stop extortionists like Wall Street billionaire Pete Peterson and the Fix the Debt campaign from holding our country’s economic future hostage.

To that end, Washington correspondent John Nichols assesses the terrifying contributions of “money power” like Peterson’s to framing, if not fully instigating, the austerity agenda. In our broken political world, where debates are being shaped by corporations, he asks whether President Obama is willing to stand up to big money in government. On Democracy Now!, he discusses the impending crisis in further detail and the billionaire austerity mongers driving it, “advocating for zombie ideas—ideas that have been slain by the voters, and frankly even by Congress, and yet they walk among us.”

Looking forward, Beltway blogger George Zornick addresses the danger that lies ahead with the White House’s alternative sequester replacement plan. While both sides play the blame game, in hopes that public support will drive the other to come to the table with concessions, he argues that there is reason to be optimistic that Obama’s plan will succeed… but that’s not necessarily a good thing. “There are no good choices here,” writes Zornick, “only less bad ones, and progressives should be wary about confusing political victory with a policy victory.”

For more analysis on the consequences of the sequester and what this means for our people, for our economy and for our future, check back in with The Nation as we continue to take a measure of Congress’s actions and the president’s priorities.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x