Washington Post Watch

Washington Post Watch

Surprise, surprise. The Washington Post editorial board, which supported the war from the beginning and has been telling us victory is within grasp for, oh, six years, says we’re winning in Iraq. If so, does that mean we can bring US troops home then? Isn’t that the point of winning?

Not so fast, says the WaPo.

Still, the likely Democratic nominee needs a plan for Iraq based on sustaining an improving situation, rather than abandoning a failed enterprise. That will mean tying withdrawals to the evolution of the Iraqi army and government, rather than an arbitrary timetable; Iraq’s 2009 elections will be crucial.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Surprise, surprise. The Washington Post editorial board, which supported the war from the beginning and has been telling us victory is within grasp for, oh, six years, says we’re winning in Iraq. If so, does that mean we can bring US troops home then? Isn’t that the point of winning?

Not so fast, says the WaPo.

Still, the likely Democratic nominee needs a plan for Iraq based on sustaining an improving situation, rather than abandoning a failed enterprise. That will mean tying withdrawals to the evolution of the Iraqi army and government, rather than an arbitrary timetable; Iraq’s 2009 elections will be crucial.

When things are bad we cannot leave because it will mean we’ve lost. When things are improved we cannot leave because these improvements are so tenuous they will be reversed in our absence. The only constant is the necessity of our continued presence until some date in the near future.

If this argument seems to you to inevitably to permanent occupation you’re catching on.

Can we count on you?

In the coming election, the fate of our democracy and fundamental civil rights are on the ballot. The conservative architects of Project 2025 are scheming to institutionalize Donald Trump’s authoritarian vision across all levels of government if he should win.

We’ve already seen events that fill us with both dread and cautious optimism—throughout it all, The Nation has been a bulwark against misinformation and an advocate for bold, principled perspectives. Our dedicated writers have sat down with Kamala Harris and Bernie Sanders for interviews, unpacked the shallow right-wing populist appeals of J.D. Vance, and debated the pathway for a Democratic victory in November.

Stories like these and the one you just read are vital at this critical juncture in our country’s history. Now more than ever, we need clear-eyed and deeply reported independent journalism to make sense of the headlines and sort fact from fiction. Donate today and join our 160-year legacy of speaking truth to power and uplifting the voices of grassroots advocates.

Throughout 2024 and what is likely the defining election of our lifetimes, we need your support to continue publishing the insightful journalism you rely on.

Thank you,
The Editors of The Nation

Ad Policy
x