War Hero McGovern Still Standing

War Hero McGovern Still Standing

Call me a McGovern wimp, but it was refreshing to run into the man himself and be reminded by this genuine patriot and war hero of just how thoughtless is the current rush to war with Iraq.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Call me a McGovern wimp, but it was refreshing to run into the man himself and be reminded by this genuine patriot and war hero of just how thoughtless is the current rush to war with Iraq.

The macho mouths whose combat experience most often consists of battles for talk-show ratings would have you believe that it takes great courage to bang the drums of war, whereas it is cowardly to speak the language of peace and diplomacy.

George McGovern is living proof that just the opposite is true.

Recall his losing 1972 contest with President Nixon, who successfully branded McGovern a subversive peacenik for calling for an end to the war in Vietnam. The result was a further, futile escalation of carpet-bombing into Cambodia, which paved the way for the genocidal Khmer Rouge to take over a devastated country.

At the time, McGovern thought it unseemly to defend himself against Nixon’s attacks by trading on his own heroic war record, and he still speaks with suspicion of those who “wear their patriotism or their religion on their sleeves.”

McGovern, 80, who earned the Distinguished Flying Cross for his thirty-five B-24 combat missions against Nazi Germany, takes particular umbrage with those who now talk of Saddam Hussein as a modern-day Hitler.

“Hitler, in possession of the world’s then-greatest military force, had the power to destroy Western civilization,” McGovern observed, while Hussein, his military eviscerated in the Gulf War and afterward, can easily be contained.

McGovern was speaking on a cruise ship in Boston Harbor to a group of Nation magazine subscribers. Many men in the audience were veterans of what has come to be viewed as the good war, and like McGovern they expressed contempt for the so-called chicken hawks who dominate the Bush war camp: men eager to send others into combat, which they themselves have not experienced.

“I’m sick and tired of those old men dreaming up wars for young men to die in,” McGovern said in an interview. “You know that [Vice President] Dick Cheney, [Defense Secretary] Donald Rumsfeld and [Deputy Defense Secretary] Paul Wolfowitz have not been in a war and will not fight in this one they are planning.”

McGovern says the Administration is committed to a jingoistic unilateralism that will only encourage more hostility and attacks on the United States. President Bush “claims that people around the world hate us for our freedom, but it is our freedom they love and our arrogance that they hate,” McGovern said. He cited a recent statement by National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice that the Administration’s main accomplishment was “the hardening of America.”

The biggest problem he has with Bush’s White House is a pattern of lying that McGovern believes rivals that of Nixon’s. For example, “Bush has said repeatedly that Saddam Hussein threw the international arms inspectors out of Iraq, but that’s not true. We withdrew our inspectors.”

The President, McGovern said, also too often relies on the language of the religious right. “I’m troubled by a President who has used the word ‘evil’ so many times that he doesn’t seem to understand that there has always been evil and always will be, unless God intervenes directly.”

The former senator is critical as well of Democrats in Congress for failing to challenge the President’s hyperaggressive foreign policy.

Mourning Sen. Paul Wellstone, one of the few bold Congressional critics of the White House’s call for war, McGovern said, “Whoever replaces him owes it to his memory to respect his opposition to the war.”

In a time when bravery is all too easily confused with bravado, George McGovern stands as a compelling reminder that it takes real courage to fight for peace.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x