Wal-Mart’s Good (and Bad) Sides

Wal-Mart’s Good (and Bad) Sides

Opposition to Wal-Mart in a community can invigorate progressive politics and expose entrenched politicians as vision-free hacks.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Bright Lights in Edison

People often ask, Is there a good side to Wal-Mart? Sometimes there is: Opposition to Wal-Mart in a community can invigorate progressive politics and expose entrenched politicians as vision-free hacks. That’s what happened last week in Edison, New Jersey, where progressive Wal-Mart opponent Jun Choi handily defeated incumbent Mayor George Spadoro, whom voters held responsible for a proposed (unpopular) Wal-Mart store, in the city’s Democratic primary last Wednesday. Choi will face Republican and Independent opponents in the November election. But in this heavily Democratic town, it’s likely that he’ll become mayor.

Seed of Scalia

Now back to Wal-Mart’s downsides: coziness with the far right and a vicious disregard for the laws of the land. On Friday, the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette reported that Rickey Armstrong, who was fired from Wal-Mart’s Dallas optical plant in March, will file a whistleblower claim with the Department of Labor, alleging that he was dismissed for reporting wrongdoing at the plant. That same week, the paper reported that Wal-Mart had hired Eugene Scalia, spawn of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, to defend the company in whistleblower cases, including a Labor Department complaint filed by Jared Bowen, a Wal-Mart vice president who was fired in April after reporting former vice chairman Tom Coughlin’s funny expense accounts. Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, workers can’t be fired for exposing company wrongdoing. Interestingly enough, Eugene Scalia served as solicitor general in the Bush Administration’s Department of Labor, where he tried to drastically weaken such protections for whistleblowers. (If he’d had his way, whistleblowers would have been protected from retaliation only if they disclosed information to a member of Congress. How many workers have a politician on their speed-dial?) After Scalia left the Labor Department, then-Acting Solicitor Howard Radzely–a Bush appointee–reversed Scalia’s decision.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x