US Must Back Syria Ceasefire

US Must Back Syria Ceasefire

Russia, China support the United Nations plan.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Writing in today’s Washington Post, David Ignatius suggests:

Maybe it’s time for Syrian revolutionaries to take “yes” for an answer from Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and back a U.N.-sponsored “managed transition” of power there, rather than rolling on toward a civil war that will bring more death and destruction for the region.

I couldn’t agree more. Already the Times is reporting widespread cases of sectarian violence pitting neighbor against neighbor.

Syria, like its neighbors Lebanon and Iraq before it, is perched at the brink of civil war. So many people could die in a Syrian civil war that it would make the thousands dead so far look like a small down payment. Problem is, the Syrian opposition, badly divided and apparently dominated by the Muslim Brotherhood, is either unwilling or incapable of making a deal.

Maybe it’s true that President Assad is only stalling for time when he says that he accepts the UN-brokered plan for a ceasefire and steps toward transition. But Assad has seemingly taken control of many of the hot spots, and there are few signs that his support among the Syrian security forces is ebbing. He’s got to keep one eye on Iran, his chief backer, which is reportedly considering hedging its bets. And Russia and China, who’ve opposed Western military action and calls for regime change, have been persuaded to support the UN plan.

It seems worth a try. The Obama administration, which continues to seek to work with Russia, is hoping for the best. So far, President Obama isn’t paying any attention at all to the likes of war-crazed fanatics such as Senator John McCain and his allies, the neoconservatives. McCain, Joe Lieberman and other senators are pushing radical legislation to demand US support for the rebels. But, worryingly, the United States is still edging closer to providing aid to the Syrian rebels, whoever they are.

As AP reports:

Despite U.S. and Arab assertions about the inevitability of the Assad regime’s fall, it is prevailing militarily and maintaining some support among Syrian minorities and even the Sunni business community. Defections have proved fewer than anticipated, and there’s little evidence to back Clinton’s prediction a month ago about a possible military coup.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x