Transparency Can Curb Corporate Impact on Elections

Transparency Can Curb Corporate Impact on Elections

Transparency Can Curb Corporate Impact on Elections

In the face of a Supreme Court decision that eliminates crucial checks on corporate political spending nationwide, we must demand greater accountability and transparency around how corporations spend money in elections across the country.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

One hundred and five years ago, Theodore Roosevelt declared in his State of the Union speech, “All contributions by corporations to any political committee or for any political purpose should be forbidden by law; directors should not be permitted to use stockholders’ money for such purposes.”

Those words bear even greater relevance today as our nation faces a watershed moment in the history of our democratic process. Two weeks ago, the United States Supreme Court struck down crucial campaign finance reforms, eliminating limits on how much corporations can spend in elections. The Supreme Court’s decision opens the floodgates for millions of corporate dollars that could have a significant impact on our democratic process and, by extension, on our public policies.

For the first time in years, the American people face an expansion of corporate influence in elections with no limits or controls. It is critical that the people seize every opportunity to fight back against a Court decision that increased power for those who are already too powerful.

This defining moment calls for decisive action. Legislative proposals have already been announced that would restore many of the reforms the Court rolled back. But we cannot just wait for new legislation. We need to find new ways to stem the growing tide of corporate influence. One path that is open to us here and now is to institute reforms from within corporations themselves. It is time to organize shareholders to demand more accountability and transparency from the corporations in which they invest.

Starting right now, even before Congress acts, institutional investors should make use of all the tools they have at their disposal to hold corporations accountable. As New York City’s Public Advocate, I serve as a trustee of the New York City Employees’ Retirement System (NYCERS), the largest pension fund in New York City. Last year, NYCERS filed shareholder resolutions calling for disclosure of political spending by twelve corporations in which they are invested. This week, I called for institutional investors nationwide to join in support of these resolutions, the first step in creating a larger grassroots movement among shareholders across the country.

Institutional investors have a responsibility as fiduciaries to hold companies accountable for their political spending. A study by economists at the University of Minnesota revealed a correlation between high levels of political spending and falling corporate governance standards and returns. In addition, a recent report from the International Monetary Fund found that there can be a negative relationship between spending on lobbying and performance among lending institutions. The problem is clear–without restrictions and without shareholder disclosure around campaign expenditures, companies, and by extension their shareholders, suffer.

My office will work with the investor community, particularly through entities like the Council of Institutional Investors, to build a national shareholder movement behind full corporate disclosure. But this is just the beginning. Going forward we will also seek to give shareholders a greater say in whether or not companies they invest in should engage in political spending, especially if it has no limits. We will support and applaud corporations that voluntarily empower shareholders by giving them greater access to and authority over campaign spending. And we will continue to shine a light on companies that resist these reforms.

In the face of a Supreme Court decision that eliminates crucial checks on corporate political spending nationwide, our goal must be to create greater accountability and transparency around how corporations spend money in elections across the country.

Right now we are in an ideal position to stand up for shareholders and ensure that their voices are heard, both by corporations and by Congress. In doing this, we will be standing up for the values of our democracy. We will be fighting against a radical court decision that rolled back crucial reforms, protecting shareholders and the public against the rising tide of corporate political spending. And we will be demanding that our elections be determined first, last and always by the will of the American people.

We need your support

What’s at stake this November is the future of our democracy. Yet Nation readers know the fight for justice, equity, and peace doesn’t stop in November. Change doesn’t happen overnight. We need sustained, fearless journalism to advocate for bold ideas, expose corruption, defend our democracy, secure our bodily rights, promote peace, and protect the environment.

This month, we’re calling on you to give a monthly donation to support The Nation’s independent journalism. If you’ve read this far, I know you value our journalism that speaks truth to power in a way corporate-owned media never can. The most effective way to support The Nation is by becoming a monthly donor; this will provide us with a reliable funding base.

In the coming months, our writers will be working to bring you what you need to know—from John Nichols on the election, Elie Mystal on justice and injustice, Chris Lehmann’s reporting from inside the beltway, Joan Walsh with insightful political analysis, Jeet Heer’s crackling wit, and Amy Littlefield on the front lines of the fight for abortion access. For as little as $10 a month, you can empower our dedicated writers, editors, and fact checkers to report deeply on the most critical issues of our day.

Set up a monthly recurring donation today and join the committed community of readers who make our journalism possible for the long haul. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has stood for truth and justice—can you help us thrive for 160 more?

Onwards,
Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x