Toggle Menu

The Progressive Case for the New England Patriots (Seriously)

The team referred to as Team Trump is far more complicated than its critics would admit.

Dave Zirin

January 22, 2018

New England Patriots quarterback Tom Brady throws a pass during the AFC championship game against the Jacksonville Jaguars, January 21, 2018.(AP Photo / David J. Phillip)

Setting aside football franchises named after racial slurs, the New England Patriots are my least favorite team in sports. It’s their annual dominance—now, in 2018, it will be eight Super Bowl appearances in 17 years—as predictively monotonous as a metronome. It’s their Hall of Fame head coach, the joyless hooded gnome Bill Belichick. It’s 40-year-old dreamboat quarterback Tom Brady and his carnival-huckster approach to physical health—for $99.99 you, too, can get the Brady pajamas with “bioceramic particles woven in to reflect back to the body infrared waves.” It’s the way referees seem to love them just a little bit too much for comfort.

The list is long, and I know I’m not alone in my disgust. Many have taken our resentment against this team and politicized it, saying in effect that a cheer for the Patriots is a cheer for the Trump agenda. They are viewed as Team Trump because their owner Bob Kraft gave a million bucks to Trump’s inauguration committee and has long touted their friendship. It’s because Belichick wrote a letter of support to Trump that Donald read aloud—almost certainly without Belichick’s approval—where he said, “You’ve proved to be the ultimate competitor and fighter. Your leadership is amazing.”

It’s the “Make America Great Again” hat hanging in Tom Brady’s locker in the summer of 2016 and Brady asking plaintively, “Why is that such a big deal?”

For people defending the franchise against these Team Trump charges, it also hasn’t helped that Nazi leaders have said that the Pats are their favorites because they are “consistently NFL’s whitest team.” (That’s not actually true, but facts have never stopped Nazis before.)

Current Issue

View our current issue

Subscribe today and Save up to $129.

Yet I want to make the counter-argument to this. First and foremost, the idea that a team is somehow progressive or reactionary is absurd. Teams are products to be sold, not political totems. There are historical exceptions to this, but they are rare. When the Brooklyn Dodgers with Jackie Robinson won, it mattered because it smashed a hole through the pervasive, everyday white supremacy of the time. The same was true with the Celtics, when led by player-coach Bill Russell, or in 1989 when Art Shell of the Raiders was hired as the first black head coach in the NFL since the 1920s. When Colin Kaepernick was throwing for 16 touchdowns and just four interceptions in 2016, while also protesting police violence and being inundated with death threats, it mattered. Again, these are rare occurrences.

Most teams instead—no matter how many players they have taking a knee—are a mess of political contradictions. Yes, Bob Kraft is a bankroller of Trump, but he’s hardly alone, in NFL ownership ranks or among the billionaire class. Yes, he is also a close friend of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, donating millions to building a football stadium in Jerusalem. Again, these actions, while noxious, are hardly exceptional, as the NFL broadly has tried to foster a relationship with Netanyahu for years, and no amount of human-rights violations have deterred them.

Yes, their coach wrote Trump a mash letter, but he’s also done some unheralded work with black youth over the years and at least, unlike then-Bills coach Rex Ryan, he wasn’t introducing Trump at rallies.

As for the team, we would do well to remember last April when an unprecedented number of Patriot players skipped the White House visit for explicitly political reasons. As defensive captain Devin McCourty said, “Basic reason for me is I don’t feel accepted in the White House. With the president having so many strong opinions and prejudices…” That Brady also didn’t show was allegedly because of an illness, but it stung Trump enough that he didn’t even mention the quarterbacks’s name during his speech. These were hardly the actions of “Team Trump.” They were a gob of spit in his eye.

Then this past year, when Trump called for players protesting racism during the anthem to be fired and cursed their names, a dozen Patriots kneeled, even through boos that came down from the stands (again, these boos were hardly exceptional in NFL stadiums). Even Bob Kraft said he was “deeply disappointed” by the president’s speech, and he supported the players’ efforts to “peacefully effect social change.” Those words may sound tepid, but given their friendship, they were volcanic at the time, showing that Trump at least publicly was not going to break the NFL.

Outside of all things Trump, the Patriots last year became the first NFL team to sponsor an LGBT sports tournament, the Flag Football tourney called the Gay Bowl. As Cyd Zeigler of OutSports has written, “The Patriots have been one of the most LGBT-inclusive NFL teams, signing an amicus brief several years ago in support of same-sex marriage.” It’s worth asking Kraft why he could financially support a president whose record on LGBT issues is monstrous. But that doesn’t change the fact that the team has stood strongly with LGBT rights in a sport historically hostile to LGBT athletes.

These contradictions on the team mirror New England’s: a place that was a beacon of the abolitionist movement against slavery and a cradle of progressivism, yet also the home of the busing riots and a racism that runs red with blood throughout its history. Yet it has to be noted that every state in New England voted against Trump in 2016. In addition, when his alt-right, Nazi shock troops rallied in Boston, the response was epic, the most overwhelming counter-demo we have seen. You have to assume there was a Patriots fan or two in the crowd.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

The point is that while many on social media will say that a victory for the Patriots is also a victory for Trump and the Nazis who love him, it’s also a victory for Devin McCourty. It’s a victory for a part of the country that just put thousands of people in the streets for the Women’s March 2018, from Cambridge, Massachusetts, to Bangor, Maine. It’s a victory for LGBT youth who have benefited from the team’s out-front solidarity.

I cannot stand this team. But putting a political gloss on why they are so repellent is unnecessary. Hate them for their arrogance, resent them for their success, but politically they are as good and awful as any franchise in the hyper-corporatized athletic-industrial complex. That’s in many ways the toughest thing to face: The Patriots are just like our own favorite teams. Only better.

Dave ZirinDave Zirin is the sports editor at The Nation. He is the author of 11 books on the politics of sports. He is also the coproducer and writer of the new documentary Behind the Shield: The Power and Politics of the NFL.


Latest from the nation