A Test for Labor

A Test for Labor

The death toll of a devastating explosion at the Upper Big Branch Mine in West Virginia has reached twenty-five.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

The death toll of a devastating explosion at the Upper Big Branch Mine in West Virginia has reached twenty-five and counting. The blast was so severe that many of the dead have yet to be identified, and four miners remain unaccounted for. The grief in this small coal mining community south of Charleston is likely compounded by the very real possibility that the accident was preventable.

In March alone the mine, a nonunion facility owned by Massey Energy, was cited by the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) for fifty-three safety violations. For example, new communications equipment that would enable rescuers to pinpoint the location of potential survivors, required by legislation passed in the wake of the 2006 Sago disaster, was only “partially installed.” That law also stiffened penalties, to which mine operators responded with an avalanche of appeals, the subject of a February House Labor Committee hearing, where MSHA’s new head, Joe Main, testified that 82,000 safety violations have piled up, awaiting remedy. Committee chair George Miller speculated at the time, “Perhaps this process is protecting those with the worst records.”

Massey may have just proved Miller right: of nearly $900,000 in MSHA fines issued last year at Upper Big Branch — hundreds of them for safety violations considered “significant and substantial” — Massey has contested more than 80 percent. As long as those fines are being challenged, points out Phil Smith, a spokesman for the United Mine Workers, MSHA is blocked from taking further action, such as putting Massey’s mine on a list of pattern offenders, which triggers rigorous intervention.

Despite this atrocious foot-dragging, Massey CEO Don Blankenship had the gall to claim to a West Virginia radio station that neither MSHA nor state regulators “would have allowed the mine to operate if it were thought to be unsafe.” (Last month Massey managers trotted out a company survey to brag that 90 percent of its underground workers “feel that the company is looking after their safety,” data that’s more than a little suspect in a nonunion mine where workers have little protection for blowing the whistle on unsafe conditions.)

In December 2008 Massey was slapped with the largest coal mining safety fines in history, totaling $4.2 million, and the company pleaded guilty to criminal charges in the deaths of two miners at another of its West Virginia mines in 2006. In filing suit against Massey, the widows of those miners uncovered a 2005 memo that revealed Blankenship’s open hostility to safety measures. “If any of you have been asked by your…engineers or anyone else to do anything other than run coal,” the memo to mine supervisors read, “you need to ignore them and run coal.”

The West Virginia explosion, the most deadly mining disaster since 1984, is the first major test for Obama’s new Department of Labor. Secretary Hilda Solis has promised to investigate and “take action.” But that means she and Main will either have to find a way to hold reckless operators like Massey accountable in the face of a crippling appeals process—or push Congress to pass a new mining bill that will close the lethal appeals loophole.

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x