Tell the Democratic Party: We Need More Debates

Tell the Democratic Party: We Need More Debates

Tell the Democratic Party: We Need More Debates

With only six primary debates scheduled, the DNC is doing the party—and our democracy— a disservice.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email
What’s going on?

Twice already, we’ve tuned in to listen to Republicans vilify immigrants, condemn diplomacy, demonize gun control laws, and argue over who hates Planned Parenthood more. But the Democratic candidates have held only one debate so far—and they only have five more scheduled

For the 2008 primary, the DNC held nine debates before Labor Day. This year, only four of the six debates are being held before the February primaries. One of the debates is being held December 19, the Saturday before Christmas.

What’s more, any candidate who participates in a debate outside this absurdly limited schedule will be banned from participating in the DNC-sanctioned debates.

This is not only bad for candidates like Martin O’Malley and Bernie Sanders, who have to compete with Hillary Clinton’s name recognition and air of inevitability. The Republican debates have seen record ratings. So while the GOP’s extreme ideas on women’s healthcare, immigration, and foreign policy are getting an audience, the Democrats are losing a key opportunity to help frame the national conversation.

What can I do?

Join The Nation and RootsAction in telling the Democratic National Committee: we need more Democratic debates.

Learn More

The Nation’s writers have been calling for more debates since the party’s schedule was announced earlier this year. Back in September, Katrina vanden Heuvel explained why the party is mistaken if they think that frontrunner Hillary Clinton is better off without additional primary debates. John Nichols has also repeatedly called on the Democratic Party to change its stance, and to go even further by having Democratic and Republican candidates debate and allowing candidates to participate in debates not sanctioned by the DNC.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x