Super Tuesday Sees Romney’s Softer Side

Super Tuesday Sees Romney’s Softer Side

Super Tuesday Sees Romney’s Softer Side

Romney’s strategy has been to tear down those around him without giving people reasons to like him.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

A father recounts the story of how his fourteen year-old daughter disappeared in New York City for three days. He then describes how his business partner closed the company and brought almost all of the employees to New York to set up a command center and search through the night. The father chokes up when he remembers how his business partner said, “I don’t care how long it takes we’re going to find her.” The girl was found and the 30-second ad spot concludes with the father stating that the man who saved his daughter was Mitt Romney.

The missing girl ad is a remarkable ad, not because of the story but because of the shift in strategy by the Romney campaign. Stories that pull at the heartstrings are commonplace in political ad narratives. However, the positive and personal tone of the ad is exceptional in relation to the consistently negative and depersonalized tone Romney has struck thus far.

Through the end of February Restore our Future, a Pro-Romney PAC, spent over $16 million dollars on advertising, 100 percent of it negative. Even the majority of the campaign’s own ad spending has been negative first focusing on Gingrich and now on Santorum. Romney’s strategy has been to tear down those around him without giving people reasons to like him. He has failed to build an image of Mitt Romney the man. His campaign has a well-developed narrative of him as CEO and Governor, but stops short of humanizing him.

What has been so puzzling about Romney not incorporating his personal life into the campaign is that he has a picture perfect narrative. He has been married to the same woman for 40 years, has a close-knit family, tithes, and above that gives to other charitable organizations. Objectively he’s a Boy Scout and compared to Gingrich and Santorum he’s a saint. But as my Mexican grandmother would say, santo que no es visto no es querido (a saint that isn’t seen isn’t loved.)

Voters care about issues and experience but they also care about a leader’s personality. People want to vote for someone they like, for someone they could see themselves having a beer with. And the fact that Romney is a millionaire that doesn’t drink isn’t the issue. George W. Bush didn’t drink and was just as wealthy as Romney, but people still wanted to have a beer with him. What matters is the perception of approachability. Voters want to cast their ballot for someone who they actually like, for someone who would drop everything and help his friend find his daughter.

The missing girl ad was created for Romney’s 2008 presidential run. It was dusted off for Super Tuesday and marks a change in tone from the previous negative ads sponsored by Restore our Future. If just a portion of the Romney ad barrage and general messaging turned to the candidate’s softer side he could pull ahead decisively. However, disclosing more of Romney’s personal side also means further highlighting his Mormonism. This is a gamble his campaign will have to take if he is to cement the GOP voters that are not anti-Mormon but also not sold on a capable yet robotic Romney.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x