Stephen Cohen: Russian Protests and the Soviet Union’s Afterlife

Stephen Cohen: Russian Protests and the Soviet Union’s Afterlife

Stephen Cohen: Russian Protests and the Soviet Union’s Afterlife

Stephen F. Cohen, professor of Russian studies at New York University and Nation contributing editor, joined Democracy Now! on Friday to discuss the significance of the Russian protests and popular reaction to the parliamentary elections.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

On the heels of the twentieth anniversary of the breakup of the Soviet Union, allegations of widespread fraud in the recent elections that gave Prime Minister Vladimir Putin’s United Russia party a parliamentary majority have galvanized massive street protests in opposition to the Russian political establishment. Stephen F. Cohen, professor of Russian studies at New York University and Nation contributing editor joined Democracy Now! on Friday to discuss the significance of the Russian protests and popular reaction to the parliamentary elections.

“The significance of the protests is obscured and skewed by the American media narrative,” says Cohen. “The reason that the people that control the financial oligarchy of Russia don’t want free elections is they know that … the people would vote for candidates pledging to confiscate their property,” which was privatized in the 1990s, he adds. He notes “these elections were not free and fair, but they were the freest and fairest in fifteen years,” and that members of the country’s middle class make up the bulk of the protesters. Cohen also argues the American media has failed to report on the resurgence of the Communist Party, supported mainly by working-class voters in Russia’s vast provinces, which could challenge Putin in the 2012 presidential race and force a run-off election.

His latest article, “The Soviet Union’s Afterlife,” appears in the January 9/16 issue of The Nation.

Support The Nation’s June Fundraising Campaign

With the midterm elections now firmly upon us, the question is whether Democratic candidates will do more than merely occupy ballot lines as mild alternatives to the red-hot crisis that is Donald Trump.

As Trump spends over $1 billion a day on a globally destabilizing war on Iran and admits that he doesn’t “think about Americans’ financial situation,” millions across the country are struggling with the surging costs of essentials. Democrats must seize this moment and advance bold, small-“d” populist ideas—not settle for cynical caution that once again snatches defeat from the jaws of victory.

The Nation elevates progressive ideas, movements, and elected officials achieving real change across the country into the national conversation. At the same time, our journalists are exposing how crypto and AI-funded super PACs are spending hundreds of millions of dollars to knock out candidates they oppose, reporting on the devastating impact of the Supreme Court’s evisceration of the Voting Rights Act, and sounding the alarm on attempts by red states to quickly redraw electoral maps, disenfranchising Southern Black voters.

We can play this critical role because of support from readers like you. This June, we’re raising $20,000 to power The Nation’s independent journalism in the run-up to November’s immensely consequential elections.

It’s in our power to build a more just society, and your support at this critical moment brings us closer to that bold vision. I hope you’ll donate today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editor and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x