Slice the Vote

Slice the Vote

Voters in three key areas of Virginia won’t see Senate challenger Jim Webb’s name on the summary page of their electronic ballots. Instead, thanks to a computer glitch, Webb’s name will read “James H. ‘Jim.’ Moreover, voters won’t know that his opponent, George Allen, is a Republican.

Election officials attribute the errors to an increase in type size, which likely can’t be remedied before the November 7 election. According to the Washington Post, the secretary of the Virginia State Board of Elections, Jean Jensen, “pledged to have it fixed by the 2007 statewide elections.”

How reassuring. Despite the shrinkage on the summary page, Webb’s full name will appear in the section where votes are actually cast. Election officials plan to post signs in voting booths explaining the discrepancy. If recent history is any indication, confusion will ensue.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Voters in three key areas of Virginia won’t see Senate challenger Jim Webb’s name on the summary page of their electronic ballots. Instead, thanks to a computer glitch, Webb’s name will read “James H. ‘Jim.’ Moreover, voters won’t know that his opponent, George Allen, is a Republican.

Election officials attribute the errors to an increase in type size, which likely can’t be remedied before the November 7 election. According to the Washington Post, the secretary of the Virginia State Board of Elections, Jean Jensen, “pledged to have it fixed by the 2007 statewide elections.”

How reassuring. Despite the shrinkage on the summary page, Webb’s full name will appear in the section where votes are actually cast. Election officials plan to post signs in voting booths explaining the discrepancy. If recent history is any indication, confusion will ensue.

Two local GOP legislators are calling for mandatory paper records to backup the erroneous electronic ballots. Good idea. It’s only control of the US Senate that’s potentially at stake.

PS: The Post also has a must-read story today further exposing Allen’s sordid racial past.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x