Shifting Goalposts on Terrorism

Shifting Goalposts on Terrorism

We’ve seen so many definitions of terrorist in the last few years, it can be hard to keep them straight. So I suppose it’s understandable when someone like Rep. Peter King from New York can’t remember what the word means anymore.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

We’ve seen so many definitions of terrorist in the last few years, it can be hard to keep them straight. So I suppose it’s understandable when someone like Rep. Peter King from New York can’t remember what the word means anymore.

Back in the ’80s, when King was Nassau County Comptroller and the chairman of the American Committee for a United Ireland, he energetically fought the extradition of former IRA volunteer, Joe Doherty from the US to the UK. He told the New York Times, "The Bush Admininstration has really turned its back on America’s tradition of being a sanctuary for political refugees. They’ve allowed their interests with the British Foreign Office to impede justice."

Flash forward to 2005, when Karl Rove and Scooter Libby outed CIA agent Valerie Plame. King called for "crosshairs" to be set on news media for not being tough enough on Plame’s husband Joe Wilson instead. He also suggested that the media "be shot" for pursuing the story.

Terrorism has a new definition now, though, and King is emphatic on who the bad guys are. "I am calling on the attorney general and supporting his efforts to fully prosecute WikiLeaks and its founder for violating the Espionage Act," he told a New York radio station.

Terrorism: it’s blowing things up, except when it’s not, and it’s leaking sensitive information, depending on who does it, and people should be extradited, except when they’re political refugees. Do I have that straight?

The F Word is a regular commentary by Laura Flanders, the host of GRITtv and editor of At The Tea Party, out now from OR Books. GRITtv broadcasts weekdays on DISH Network and DIRECTv, on cable, and online at GRITtv.org and TheNation.com. Follow GRITtv or GRITlaura on Twitter and be our friend on Facebook.

 
Like this blog post? Read all Nation blogs on the Nation’s free iPhone App, NationNow.
NationNow iPhone App
 

Support The Nation’s June Fundraising Campaign

With the midterm elections now firmly upon us, the question is whether Democratic candidates will do more than merely occupy ballot lines as mild alternatives to the red-hot crisis that is Donald Trump.

As Trump spends over $1 billion a day on a globally destabilizing war on Iran and admits that he doesn’t “think about Americans’ financial situation,” millions across the country are struggling with the surging costs of essentials. Democrats must seize this moment and advance bold, small-“d” populist ideas—not settle for cynical caution that once again snatches defeat from the jaws of victory.

The Nation elevates progressive ideas, movements, and elected officials achieving real change across the country into the national conversation. At the same time, our journalists are exposing how crypto and AI-funded super PACs are spending hundreds of millions of dollars to knock out candidates they oppose, reporting on the devastating impact of the Supreme Court’s evisceration of the Voting Rights Act, and sounding the alarm on attempts by red states to quickly redraw electoral maps, disenfranchising Southern Black voters.

We can play this critical role because of support from readers like you. This June, we’re raising $20,000 to power The Nation’s independent journalism in the run-up to November’s immensely consequential elections.

It’s in our power to build a more just society, and your support at this critical moment brings us closer to that bold vision. I hope you’ll donate today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Huevel
Editor and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x