Senator Vicki Kennedy?

Senator Vicki Kennedy?

Ted Kennedy has been well remembered and buried.

Now, the question becomes, who will replace “the lion of the Senate” in the seat representing the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

Some of Kennedy’s closest friends in the Senate have made a choice.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Ted Kennedy has been well remembered and buried.

Now, the question becomes, who will replace “the lion of the Senate” in the seat representing the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

Some of Kennedy’s closest friends in the Senate have made a choice.

They want it to be the senator’s widow, Vicki.

Before her husband’s death, Vicki Kennedy expressed reluctance about the accepting a temporary appointment for the Massachusetts seat and about running in a special election (tentatively set for January) to fill the remainder of the term.

But momentum is building — as least among Kennedy’s fellow senators — for her selection.

Utah Senator Orrin Hatch, a longtime colleague of the late senator’s on the Judiciary Committee and his closest friend on the Republican side of the aisle, said Sunday on CNN: “I think Vicki ought to be considered. She’s a very brilliant lawyer. She’s a very solid individual. She certainly made a difference in Ted’s life, let me tell you. And I have nothing but great respect for her.”

Connecticut Senator Chris Dodd, Kennedy’s frequent ally in legislative fights and closest friend on the Democratic side, said pretty much the same thing.

“Whatever Vicki wants to do, I’m in her corner,” Dodd told CNN. “She knows that. And she’s expressed to me her own sort of reluctance to [fill in for Kennedy], but she could change her mind. If she did, I’m for it. I think she’d be great.”

“She brings talent and ability to it, and to fill that spot I think is something the people of Massachusetts would welcome. We could certainly use her in the Senate,” Dodd continued. “But I leave that up to her. She’s got a lot on her mind right now, and frankly, I’ll leave it up to her decision-making process.”

Speculation about appointing Kennedy comes as Massachusetts legislators ponder a proposal to allow the state’s Democratic governor, Deval Patrick, to appoint a temporary replacement to serve until a special election that would likely be held in January.

The proposed change is controversial, and has drawn much criticism from Republicans who hope to take advantage of the Kennedy vacancy — which puts Democrats one seat down from the 60 they need to thwart filibusters on major issues such as healthcare reform.

That makes Hatch’s statement a significant one. The prospect of a Vicki Kennedy appointment could ease the way for changing the law. Additionally, having a prominent Republican on the Vicki Kennedy bandwagon might give Governor Patrick another reason to appoint her — if she shows an interest in the seat.

Those who oppose the appointment of senators — including this writer — continue to hold out hope that efforts to rewrite Massachusetts law to permit an appointment will be thwarted. The better choice is to set a tight election schedule that will allow everyone who wants the seat — Vicki Kennedy included — to contend for it, and allow the voters to make the choice.

How would a Kennedy, especially a Kennedy widow with strong skills and a winning personality, do in a special election?

This is Massachusetts we’re talking about. She would win.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x